Orissa

Rayagada

CC/61/2021

Panchanana Nayak - Complainant(s)

Versus

The Manager, Sriram City Union Finance Ltd., - Opp.Party(s)

Self

05 Apr 2023

ORDER

DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION RAYAGADA, ODISHA.

 

Date of Institution: 17.03.2021

    Date of Final Hearing: 29.03.2023

        Date of  Pronouncement: 05.04.2023

 

CONSUMER COMPLAINT NO. 61 / 2021

Sri  Panchanan Nayak,  S/O: Shankar Nayak, 

At:Rohit  Colony, Sastri Nagar 5th.lane,

Po/ Dist: Rayagada, 765 001,State:Odisha, 

Cell No. 9439249061

.(Through Self for the Complainant)                          …Complainant

 

Versus

1.The Manager, Sriram Transport Finance Company Ltd.,

 101-105, Ist. Floor,B wing, Shiv Chambers, Sector-11,

C.B.D. Belapur,

Navi Mumbai- 400 614.

(None for the O.Ps)    

2. The   Branch  Manager,

Sriram Transport Finance Company Ltd.,

Near Swagat  Hotel,  Po/Dist:  Rayagada, State:Odisha.

(None for the O.Ps)                                         …Opposite Parties

 

Present:          1. Sri Rajendra Kumar Panda, President.

          2. Sri Satish Kumar Panigrahi, Member.

ORDER

Sri  Rajendra  Kumar  Panda, President.

Brief facts of the case:-

Case in hand is the allegation of  deficiency in service and unfair trade practice by the O.Ps  for  not to seize the  finance vehicle bearing Regd. No. OR-14J-2711 which  the complainant sought  redressal.

The complainant  is found absent on  repeated calls. O.Ps are also found absent.  Perused the  case record. The complainant simply filed the  complaint petition but not filed the  supporting  original documents  or else attested true copies of the supporting documents. Notices has been  duly served  to the O.Ps but they  have  not appeared nor taken any steps.  The  complainant  remained absent from the date of filing  of the complaint, no steps have been  taken on his behalf.  Further the  complainant could not appeared before this commission on the date fixed   i.e. on  29.03.2023  though notices has been duly served upon him.

The complainant failed to perform his obligatory  duty to remain present.                                      

In the result this commission dismiss the  complaint for default U/S- 38(3)© of the C.P.Act,2019.

.Miscellaneous  order if any  delivered by this  commission  relating to this case  stands vacated. 

 A copy of this order be provided to all the parties at  free of cost as mandated by the Consumer Protection Act,  2019 or they may download same from the confonet.nic.in to treat the same as if copy of order received from this Commission.

The judgment be uploaded forthwith on the website of the Commission for the perusal of the parties.

File be consigned to the record room along with a copy of this Judgment.

  

 (S. K. PANIGRAHI)                                                        (R. K. PANDA)

MEMBER                                                                 PRESIDENT

 

PRONOUNCED ON 05.04.2023

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Consumer Court Lawyer

Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!

Experties

Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes

Phone Number

7982270319

Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.