
Revanappa S/o Narasappa Melakunde filed a consumer case on 19 Aug 2017 against The manager DCC Bank Ltd in the Bidar Consumer Court. The case no is CC/13/2017 and the judgment uploaded on 31 Aug 2017.
::BEFORE THE DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM, AT BIDAR::
C.C. No.13/2017
Date of filing: 04.02.2017
Date of disposal: 19.08.2017
P R E S E N T:-
(1) Shri. Jagannath Prasad Udgata, B.A., LL.B.,
President
(2) Shri. Shankrappa (Halipurgi),
B.A.LL.B.,
Member
COMPLAINANT/S: 1) Revanappa S/o Narsappa Melkunde,
Age :75 years,Occ: Pensioner Retd. as
ARCS and Chairman-Dr.B.R.Ambedkar Bhavan,
Construction Committee, Naubad, Bidar
R/o H.No.17-2-237, Gandhi Nagar Colony,
Bidar.
2) Gopalrao Lade S/o Gundappa Lade,
Age : 73 years, Occ : Pensioner & Treasurer,
Dr. B.R. AmbedkarBhavan Construction
Committee Naubad, Bidar,
R/o LIG No.37, Hudco, KHB Colony,
Bidar.
(By Sri. Arjun Rao Dange, Adv.)
VERSUS
OPPONENT/S: The Manager,
DCC Bank Limited,
Head Office, Near Basaveshwar Chowk,
Hyderabad Road,
Bidar.
(By Sri. Sanjayakumar S.Patil, Adv.)
:: J UD G M E N T ::
By Shri. Jagannath Prasad Udgata, President.
The complainants.1 and 2 being Chairman and Treasurer of the Dr. B.R. AmbedkarBhavan Construction Committeeaccepted the donations from the general public especially from Scheduled Caste community, and the said amounts were kept in Fixed Deposits in the joint name of the complainants vide FD certificate No.004652 for Rs.40,742/- on 31.12.2008, maturity was on 30.11.2010 for maturity amount of Rs.49,911/-, FD No.004655for Rs.38,067/-on 31.12.2008, maturity was on 30.11.2010 for the maturity amount of Rs.46,634/-, FD No.004654 for Rs.50,074/- on 1.1.2009, maturity was on 1.12.2010 for maturity amount of Rs.61,344/- and FD No.004653 for Rs.48,538/- on 11.1.2009, maturity was on 11.12.2010 for maturity amount of Rs.59,462/- and the same were renewed periodically. The O.P bank is bound to render services towards the complainant being the consumers. Total maturity comes to Rs.2,84,260/- up to the year 2013 only. All the above said FD certificates are due to be liquidated for their maturity sum on due dates of maturity. The complainants approached requesting the O.P to liquidate the FD certificates and filed a discharge requisition and receipt of which the O.P acknowledged on 30.1.2017 and issued an endorsement on dated 01.02.2017 not considered as the claim of the FD certificates is in dispute in CC No.93/2016 before the Forum. It is submitted by the complainants that, at the time of requisition of issue of FD certificates, the complainants herein have signed and filed application duly putting in specimen signatures of the complainants on behalf of the committee and by verifying, accepting the same, the O.P issued FD certificates. Issuance of said endorsement by the O.P amounts to unfair trade practice and deficiency in service on the part of the O.P. The complainants on behalf of the committee are responsible for the construction of AmbedkarBhavan and the said FD certificates are renewed only up to the 2013 and beyond the 2013 the same are due to be renewed and liquidated with accrued interest thereon upto date. Hence, the complaint for direction to O.P. to release the FD amounts etc.
6. Considering contention of the complainant, the following points arise for our consideration:-
7. Our answers to the points stated above are as follows:-
:: REASONS ::
8. Point No.1 :- In the instant case, the O.P. Bank has refused to entertain the claims of the present complainant for receiving the maturity value of the F.D.s. on the rightful ground that, another person by name
Sri. Shivalingappa Kange was claiming the same proceeds and has approached the Forum inc.c.No.93/2016.
9. On the surface of the matter, it is crystal clear that, funds were collected by a committee from the public for utilisation of a public purpose. It was stated at the Bar that, such committee was not a registered one. Now, it is up to the office bearers of the committee to establish their credentials to claim the amount and when there are two rival claimants, the O.P. bank was justified in refusing the payments and seeking production of documents to ascertain the real beneficiaries. Thereby we hold that, the complainants have failed to establish the culpa of the O.P. bank and answer the point No.1 accordingly.
10. Point No.1 :- As on today, we have dismissed the counter complaint in C.C. No. 93/2016. Unfortunately both the feuding groups are trying to get a declaratory relief from this Forum for which we are not legally empowered and thence we proceed to pass the following:
:: ORDERS ::
(Typed to our dictation then corrected, signed by us and then pronounced in the open Forum on this 19th day of August-2017)
Sri. Shankrappa H. Sri. Jagannath Prasad
Member. President.
Documents produced by the complainant
employees Housing Co. op. society Ltd. in address of
G.G.Lade.
Document produced by the Opponent.
-Nil-
Sri. Shankrappa H. Sri. Jagannath Prasad
Member. President.
Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes
Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.