Karnataka

Bangalore 1st & Rural Additional

CC/227/2022

SRI.S.PRANAVA KUMAR - Complainant(s)

Versus

THE MANAGER, CHOLAMANDALAM M.S. GENERAL INSURANCE CO. LTD - Opp.Party(s)

Sri E Rajagopala

08 Aug 2022

ORDER

BEFORE THE BENGALURU RURAL AND URBAN I ADDITIONAL
DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM, I FLOOR, BMTC, B BLOCK, TTMC BUILDING, K.H.ROAD, SHANTHI NAGAR, BENGALURU-27
 
Complaint Case No. CC/227/2022
( Date of Filing : 28 Jul 2022 )
 
1. SRI.S.PRANAVA KUMAR
S/o SP Sambanda Murthy Aged about 31 years R/at No.161, 7th Cross Teachers colony, Opp. Vasudha Bahvan Kumaraswamy Layout Bengaluru 560 111. Mob:9449362890
...........Complainant(s)
Versus
1. THE MANAGER, CHOLAMANDALAM M.S. GENERAL INSURANCE CO. LTD
Dare House, 2nd Floor New No.2, (Old No.234) NSC Bose Road, Chennai 600 001.
............Opp.Party(s)
 
BEFORE: 
 HON'BLE MR. H.R.SRINIVAS, B.Sc. LL.B., PRESIDENT
 HON'BLE MR. Y.S. Thammanna, B.Sc. LLB. MEMBER
 HON'BLE MRS. Sharavathi S.M.,B.A. L.L.B MEMBER
 
PRESENT:
 
Dated : 08 Aug 2022
Final Order / Judgement

CC:227/2022

Dated:08.08.2022

ORDERS ON MAINTAINABILITY OF THE COMPLAINT

1.     Heard the counsel for the complainant regarding the maintainability of the complaint before this commission. Complainant has sought refund of Rs.51,450/- being the balance amount spent for his hospitalization expenses. On perusing the complaint, it is mentioned therein that he had obtained a health insurance policy from OP and due to COVID, he was admitted to the hospital for which he had to spent Rs.2,23,920/- and made a claim with OP who refused to pay the amount on the ground that the treatment was not required hospitalization and could have been treated on OPD basis against which he made a complaint to the insurance ombudsman who ordered the OP to pay Rs.1,69,153/- and that he has spent more money then what was ordered by ombudsman and hence for direction to OP to pay the balance of the amount spent i.e. Rs.51,450/- .

2.     The copy of the order passed by the ombudsman for insurance had been produced wherein, it is stated that:

“The complaint emanated from denial of health (Covid 19) claim of Rs.2,23,920/- under policy number 2890/00033106/000/00 by the Respondent Insurer (RI) stating that hospitalization was not required. Complainant’s representation to the RI for reconsideration of his claim did not result in any resolution. Hence the complainant approached this Forum for relief. The complaint was registered on 30.12.2021.

Upon intervention of the Forum, the RI vide their email dated 17.03.2022 agreed to pay Rs.1,69,153/- as per policy’s terms and conditions.

The  Complainant vide his email dated 17.03.2022 accepted the above settlement offer as full and final settlement of the said claim.

AWARD

Taking into account the facts and circumstances of the case and based on the records made available to this forum, the complaint was resolved amicably upon mediation by the Forum wherein both the parties have agreed to the payment of Rs.1,69,153/- as full and final settlement of the lciam. Hence, the complaint is treated as closed and disposed of accordingly.

Compliance of Award:

Attention of the complainant and the insurer  is hereby invited to the following:

a. The Complainant shall submit all requirements/Documents required for compliance of award within 15 days of receipt of the award to the Respondent Insurer.

b.  As per Rule 17(6) of Insurance Ombudsman Rules, 2017, the insurer shall comply with the award within thirty days of the receipt of the award and update compliance of the same in the CMS module provided for complaints registered at the Forum.”

3.     When the said award is taken in to consideration, the said award has been passed amicably upon the mediation between the parties and complainant has agreed to get the matter settled for Rs.1,69,153/- against the claim of Rs.2,23,920/- as full and final settlement of the claim and as a result the ombudsman closed the complaint of the complainant as fully settled and closed.  When the complainant himself has unequivocally admitted that he has agreed to receive Rs.1,69,153/- towards the full and final settlement of the claim of Rs.2,23,920/-, this complaint on the same cause of action is not maintainable as matter has been settled and there is also direction by the ombudsman to the insurance company to pay the said amount within 30 days. When such being the case, it is for the complainant to file the Execution petition or the course open to him to recover the said amount for having agreed for the said amount.  Hence in our view this complaint is not maintainable on the same cause of action and hence the COMPLAINT IS HEREBY DISMISSED.

 

  MEMBER       MEMBER         PRESIDENT

 

 
 
[HON'BLE MR. H.R.SRINIVAS, B.Sc. LL.B.,]
PRESIDENT
 
 
[HON'BLE MR. Y.S. Thammanna, B.Sc. LLB.]
MEMBER
 
 
[HON'BLE MRS. Sharavathi S.M.,B.A. L.L.B]
MEMBER
 

Consumer Court Lawyer

Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!

Experties

Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes

Phone Number

7982270319

Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.