West Bengal

Nadia

CC/99/2022

DIPAK CHAKRABORTY - Complainant(s)

Versus

THE MANAGER / INCHARGE, CLEAR SIGHT - Opp.Party(s)

12 Oct 2022

ORDER

DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION
NADIA
170,DON BOSCO ROAD, AUSTIN MEMORIAL BUILDING.
NADIA, KRISHNAGAR
 
Complaint Case No. CC/99/2022
( Date of Filing : 29 Sep 2022 )
 
1. DIPAK CHAKRABORTY
AGED ABOUT 42 YEARS, S/O- LATE TAPAN CHSKRABORTY, VILL- HARANATHPARA, P.O.- ARANGHATA, P.S.- DHANTALA, DIST- NADIA, PIN- 741501, W.B.
NADIA
WEST BENGAL
...........Complainant(s)
Versus
1. THE MANAGER / INCHARGE, CLEAR SIGHT
47, A-1, SWAMI VIVEKANANDA SARANI, RANAGHAT, NADIA, W.B., PIN- 741201.
WEST BENGAL
2. MR. CHANCHAL MUKHERJEE, PARTNER OF CLEAR SIGHT,
27-J, R.N. TAGORE ROAD, HIGH STREET, KRISHNAGAR, NADIA, W.B., PIN- 741101.
NADIA
WEST BENGAL
3. MR. SOURAV MUKHERJEE,
PARTNER OF CLEAR SIGHT, 27-J, R.N. TAGORE ROAD, HIGH STREET, KRISHNAGAR, NADIA, W.B., PIN- 741101.
WEST BENGAL
............Opp.Party(s)
 
BEFORE: 
 HON'BLE MR. DAMAN PROSAD BISWAS PRESIDENT
 HON'BLE MRS. MALLIKA SAMADDER MEMBER
 HON'BLE MR. NIROD BARAN ROY CHOWDHURY MEMBER
 
PRESENT:
 
Dated : 12 Oct 2022
Final Order / Judgement

CC/ 99/2022

ORDER No. 02

DTD. 12.10.2022

 

Today is fixed for admission hearing.

Complainant files hajira through Ld. Advocate.

Heard the Ld. Advocate for the complaint in full.

Perused the complaint and xerox copies of the documents so filed by the complainant.

Complainant alleged in the petition of complaint that on 26.06.2021 he had purchased one spectacles from OP no. 1  on payment of Rs. 11,989/- but after 10 months said fram starts rusting and corrosion and also tinted and become unuseable and glass of the spectacle also not able to met the assure presification as expect by the complainant.

 

 He further alleged that vision of the glass become hazi and cannot give any clarity to look and read and in total whole spectacles becomes unuseable.

But  complainant  failed to produce any warranty card or Guaranty card  in  support in his contention.

 He frankly submits that no such card was issued in his favour.

 We find from the petition of compliant that till first 10 months complainant finds no complaint of the aforesaid product.

 In absence of any warranty card or Guaranty card such type of allegation cannot be entertained.

In view of the aforesaid discussion we are of the firm view that complainant fail to establish prima facie case against the OP no. 1 to 3 relating to deficiency of service.

  Accordingly, the case is not admitted.

 Hence,

It is ordered,

 

 That the present case vide no. CC/99/2022 be and the same is dismissed as not admitted.

 

 
 
[HON'BLE MR. DAMAN PROSAD BISWAS]
PRESIDENT
 
 
[HON'BLE MRS. MALLIKA SAMADDER]
MEMBER
 
 
[HON'BLE MR. NIROD BARAN ROY CHOWDHURY]
MEMBER
 

Consumer Court Lawyer

Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!

Experties

Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes

Phone Number

7982270319

Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.