
Himadri Sekhar Kar filed a consumer case on 29 Jun 2017 against The Director, Alchemist Infra Realty Ltd. in the Paschim Midnapore Consumer Court. The case no is CC/39/2017 and the judgment uploaded on 06 Jul 2017.
DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM
PASCHIM MEDINIPUR.
Bibekananda Pramanik, President,
Sagarika Sarkar, Member.
and
Pulak Kumar Singha, Member.
Complaint Case No.39/2017
Himadri Sekhar Kar, S/o Late Chandra Sekhar Kar, Shib Bazar, Mallick Chawk, District –
Medinipur. West Bengal, PIN-721101…………..………..……Complainant.
Vs.
For the Complainant: Mr. Subal Chakraborty, Advocate.
For the O.P. : Mr.
Decided on: - 29/06/2017
ORDER
Bibekananda Pramanik, President – Complainant Himadri Sekhar Kar has filed this present complaint u/s 12 of the C.P. Act 1986, thereby alleging deficiency in service against the O.Ps namely the Director, Alchemist Infra Realty Ltd., Branch Manager, Alchemist Ltd. and the Regional Manager, Alchemist Ltd.
Contd…………………..P/2
( 2 )
Facts of the case, in brief, is that the complainant has invested a sum of
Rs.2,50,000/- on 25/03/2013 with the O.P. no.1 through the O.P. no.2 for the period of three
years in monthly savings schemes (MIS) and he was allotted certificate of property vide allotment no.RX00039977 dated 15/04/2013 and the date of maturity was on 25/03/2016. From such investment monthly payment advices of Rs.2,500/- was issued by O.P. no.1 amongst which the payment advice for 25/08/2015 to 25/01/2016 total amounting to Rs.15,000/- was unpaid for want of fund. After the maturity, the total outstanding comes to Rs.2,50,000/- plus Rs.15,000/- i.e.Rs. 2,65,000/. The complainant demanded the maturity amount from the O.Ps by depositing original certificate and other requisite documents with the O.P. no.2 well within time but the O.Ps totally kept silent regarding disbursement of the maturity amount to the complainant. Therefore the complainant served a demand notice through his advocate vide notice dated 18/01/2017 thereby asking the O.Ps to pay the said sum within 30 days from the date of receiving of the notice. Even after expiry of 30 days, nothing has been paid by the O.Ps to the complainant thereby causing financial loss and mental agony to the complainant. Hence the complaint, praying for directing the O.Ps to pay a sum of Rs.2,65,000/- along with interest @ 10% p.a. from the date of maturity, an award of compensation of Rs.30,000/- for mental agony and an amount of Rs.10,000/- as litigation cost.
It is to be stated here that on prayer of the complainant, the name of O.P. no.3 was expunged from the cause title of the petition of complaint vide order no.4 dated 08/05/2017. Notice of this case upon O.P. no.1 was duly served and O.P. no.2 refused to receive the notice, so sent by registered post, which amounts to due service of summons. In spite of service of summons, neither the O.P. no.1 nor the O.P. no.2 appeared in this case. Hence the case was ordered to be heard ex parte against the O.P. nos.1 & 2. Hence, the ex parte hearing.
To prove his case, the complainant has examined himself as PW-1 by tendering a written examination –in-chief and the documents, relied upon him, have been marked as exhibit 1 to 3 respectively.
Point for decision
Has the complainant able to prove his case?
Decision with reasons
In his written examination-in-chief supported by affidavit Sri Sasanka Sekhar Maity, the complainant ,has fully corroborated his case of the petition of complaint in material particulars. He deposed that he has invested a sum of Rs.2,50,000/- on 25/03/2013 with the
Contd…………………..P/3
( 3 )
O.P. no.1 through O.P. no.2 for a period of three years in MIS scheme and he was also issued a certificate vide no. RX00039977 dated 15/04/2013 and the date of maturity was on 25/03/2016. He further deposed that even after the date of maturity, the O.Ps. did not disburse the maturity amount to the complainant for which a legal demand notice was served vide letter dated 18/01/2017 to the O.Ps, thereby asking them to pay the maturity amount within 30 days. Even after expiry of 30 days, nothing has been paid by the O.ps. Exhibit 1 to 3 clearly support the evidence of PW-1. So in view of the evidence of PW-1 and the documentary evidence i.e. exhibit 1 & 3, remaining unchallenged, we are constrained to hold that the complainant’s case is proved and he is entitled to the reliefs as sought for.
Hence, it is,
Ordered,
that the complaint case no.39/2017 is allowed ex parte against the O.Ps. O.P. nos.1 & 2 are directed to pay jointly or severely a sum of Rs.2,65,000/- together with interest @ 10% p.a. from the date of maturity i.e. on 25/03/2016 till realization to the complainant and they are further directed to pay the complainant a sum of Rs.5000/- as compensation and a sum of Rs.3000/- as litigation cost. All such payments shall be made within 30 days from the date of this order.
Let plain copy of this order be given to the complainant free of cost.
President Member Member President
District Forum
Paschim Medinipur
Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes
Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.