Kerala

Thiruvananthapuram

CC/13/2021

B.Rajan - Complainant(s)

Versus

The Chairman and MD,Hindustan Latex life care limited - Opp.Party(s)

23 Feb 2022

ORDER

DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION
SISUVIHAR LANE
VAZHUTHACAUD
THIRUVANANTHAPURAM
695010
 
Complaint Case No. CC/13/2021
( Date of Filing : 16 Jan 2021 )
 
1. B.Rajan
ushas nagar,pangapara,Trivandrum
...........Complainant(s)
Versus
1. The Chairman and MD,Hindustan Latex life care limited
Poojapura,Trivandrum
............Opp.Party(s)
 
BEFORE: 
 HON'BLE MR. Sri.P.V.JAYARAJAN PRESIDENT
 HON'BLE MRS. Preetha .G .Nair MEMBER
 HON'BLE MR. Viju V.R MEMBER
 
PRESENT:
 
Dated : 23 Feb 2022
Final Order / Judgement

BEFORE THE DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION

VAZHUTHACAUD : THIRUVANANTHAPURAM

 

PRESENT

 

 

SRI.  P.V. JAYARAJAN                              :           PRESIDENT

SMT. PREETHA G. NAIR                           :           MEMBER

SRI. VIJU  V.R.                                             :           MEMBER

 

C.C.No. 13/2021  Filed on 16/01/2021

ORDER DATED: 23/02/2022

 

Complainant:

:

B.Rajan, Tharasree, House no.KNRA-29, Ushas Nagar, Pangappara.P.O., Pin – 695 581, Thiruvananthapuram (C.No.639 Jr.Officer, H.L.L Lifecare Ltd., Peroorkada tvm.5)

             (Party in person)

 

Opposite party

:

Chairman and Managing Director, H.L.L.Lifecare, Poojappura, TVM – 695 001.                                     (By Adv.Ajith.S.Nair)

ORDER

SRI.P.V. JAYARAJAN, PRESIDENT:

This is a complaint filed under section 35 of Consumer Protection Act 2019 and the matter stood over to this date for consideration.After hearing the matter the commission passed an order as follows:

This complaint was filed by the complainant against the opposite party with regard to the payment of gratuity. When the case came up for consideration today the complainant filed a memo stating that the complainant is not willing to further proceed with this complaint.  The memo filed by the complainant accepted and recorded.  In view of the above memo we find that this is a fit case to be dismissed as not pressed.

In the result the complaint is dismissed as not pressed.  There will be no order as to cost.    

 

A copy of this order as per the statutory requirements be forwarded to the parties free of charge and thereafter the file be consigned to the record room.

Dictated to the Confidential Assistant, transcribed by her, corrected by me and pronounced in the Open Court, this the 23rd day of February,  2022.

 

Sd/-

P.V. JAYARAJAN

:

PRESIDENT

Sd/-

PREETHA G. NAIR

 

:

 

      MEMBER

Sd/-

VIJU  V.R.

:

MEMBER

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

C.C. No. 13/2021

APPENDIX

 

  1. COMPLAINANT’S WITNESS:

 

 

NIL

  1. COMPLAINANT’S DOCUMENTS:

 

 

  1.  
  1. OPPOSITE PARTY’S WITNESS:

 

 

NIL

  1. OPPOSITE PARTY’S DOCUMENTS:

 

 

NIL

 

                                                                                                                            Sd/-

                                                                                                                 PRESIDENT

 

 

 

 

 

 

 
 
[HON'BLE MR. Sri.P.V.JAYARAJAN]
PRESIDENT
 
 
[HON'BLE MRS. Preetha .G .Nair]
MEMBER
 
 
[HON'BLE MR. Viju V.R]
MEMBER
 

Consumer Court Lawyer

Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!

Experties

Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes

Phone Number

7982270319

Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.