West Bengal

Bankura

CC/41/2019

Goutam Kundu - Complainant(s)

Versus

The Branch Manager, State Bank of India, Boga Branch - Opp.Party(s)

Self

03 Oct 2023

ORDER

  IN    THE   DISTRICT   CONSUMER   DISPUTES   REDRESSAL COMMISSION, BANKURA

  Consumer Complaint No. 41/2019

              Date of Filing: 22-07-2019   

Before:                                        

1. Samiran Dutta                              Ld. President.      

2. Rina Mukherjee                          Ld. Member. 

3. Siddhartha Sankar Bhui            Ld. Member.            

 

For the Complainant:  Self

For the O.P. : Ld. Advocate Prasun Kumar Bandyopadhyay

 

Complainant  

Goutam Kundu, Son of Late Aloke Kundu

Present Address :- At Pranabananda Pally, P.O. Kenduadihi, P.S. + Dist. – Bankura, Pin – 722102, Mob. 9932215389.

Permanent Address : vill. – Kurchibaid, P.O. – Jorda, P.S. -  Indpur, Dist. – Bankura, Pin – 722173.

Opposite Party 

The Branch Manager, State Bank of India, Boga Branch, P.O. – Boga, P.S. Indpur, Dist. – Bankura, Pin – 722136, Mob. No.8001195451.

                                                                                                                                          

FINAL ORDER / JUDGEMENT  

Order No.30

Dated:03-10-2023

Both parties file hazira through advocate.

The case is fixed for argument.

After hearing argument from both sides the Commission proceeds to dispose of the case as hereunder:-

The Complainant’s case is that he was favoured with PMEGP loan during F.Y. 2013-14 for Fish Fed Manufacturing Unit to be disbursed through O.P./Bank on certain terms and condition. The O.P./Bank has already disbursed Rs.3 Lakh to the loan account of the Complainant No. being 34529546015 out of the sanctioned loan of Rs.25 Lakh of which Govt. subsidy is Rs.8,75,000/- and Complainant’s own contribution is Rs.1,25,000/- and Bank loan is Rs.15 Lakh but the Complainant needs more money to complete the construction work for the project but the O.P./ Bank has deliberately failed to fulfill their part of contract and has thereby frustrated the project of the Complainant. Hence this case.

O.P. contested the case by filing a written version contending inter alia that estimated cost of construction work is Rs.4 Lakh as per terms and condition of the project and the O.P./Bank has already disbursed Rs.3 Lakh for the same and the Complainant is not entitled to get further fund from the O.P./Bank towards the construction purpose as the Complainant has deviated from the terms and contracts of the project by exceeding the cost of construction.

                                                                                                                                                                                        Contd……p/2

Page: 2

-: Decision with reasons: -

Having regard to the facts of the case, submission, contention and documents on record on both sides the Commission finds that the project started during the F.Y. 2013-14 and till date the Complainant has not paid his own contribution and also EMI of Rs.37,380/- commencing from July, 2015 as is evident from the terms and condition of the loan account though the Bank has already disbursed Rs.3 Lakh in favour of the Complainant. The O.P./Bank is no more interested to proceed with the project by disbursement of any further fund as the Complainant has already exceeded the construction cost beyond Rs.4 Lakh as per inspection report of the O.P./Bank dated:08/11/2016.

It is a Govt. scheme loan and the Complainant must abide by the terms and condition and rules and regulation of the loan account and the O.P. / Bank cannot act beyond the terms and condition of the loan account by disbursement of any further fund to the Complainant as claimed from time to time. The case is devoid of merit.

Hence it is ordered……..

That the case be and the same is dismissed on contest but without cost.

Both parties be supplied copy of this Judgement free of cost.

 

 ____________________                _________________           _________________

HON’BLE   PRESIDENT            HON’BLE MEMBER       HON’BLE MEMBER

Consumer Court Lawyer

Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!

Experties

Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes

Phone Number

7982270319

Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.