Orissa

Rayagada

CC/80/2018

Phakir Naik - Complainant(s)

Versus

The Branch Manager, State Bank of Inda - Opp.Party(s)

Self

25 Feb 2021

ORDER

DISTRICT   CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION,

POST  /  DIST: Rayagada,  STATE:  ODISHA,  Pin No. 765001.

                                                      ******************

C.C.case  No.     80      / 2018.                             Date.     25     . 2. 2021

P R E S E N T .

Sri   Gadadhara  Sahu,                                                      President.

Smt.Padmalaya  Mishra,.                                                 Member

 

Sri Phakir Naik,  At: D.Koral, Po:Kucheipadar,  Dist: Rayagada. (Odisha).765 015.                                                              …Complainant.

Versus.

 

Vrs.

1. The  Branch Manager, State  Bank of India, Tikiri  Branch, Tikiri, Dist:Rayagada.                                                                 .…..Opposite    Parties.

Counsel for the parties:                         

For the complainant: - Sri  K.K. Sahu, Advocate.

.For the O.Ps  :- Sri  Santosh Kumar Mohapatra, Advocate, Rayagada.

 

JUDGEMENT

The  crux of the case is that  the above named complainant alleging deficiency in service  against  afore mentioned O.Ps    for   non issue  N.O.C towards loan account No.32941192762  for which  the complainant  sought for redressal of the grievances raised by the complainant.

Upon  Notice, the O.Ps put in their appearance and filed  written version through their learned counsel in which  they refuting allegation made against them.  The O.Ps  taking one and another pleas in the written version   sought to dismiss the complaint as it is not maintainable  under the C.P. Act.  The facts which are not specifically admitted may be treated  as denial of the O.Ps. Hence the O.Ps  prays the forum to dismiss the case against  them  to meet the ends of justice.

During the course of hearing the  learned counsel for the complainant has  filed a memo and  submitted that  the complainant  has   received  the N.O.C.  towards  the loan account No. 32941192762  from the O.Ps and not interested to proceed  the present  case further  and the complainant prays the District Commission  to   close  the case accordingly  as settled out of the court  for the best interest of justice.

  Heard from the parties. During the course of hearing the learned counsel  for  the O.Ps has not objected the memo filed by  the complainant.  Perused  the   record  and  memo  filed by the complainant.  The memo is allowed.

                Accordingly the present dispute mitigated  and the  case stands disposed  off  but O.Ps wriggled out of  liabilities & the  case closed against  them    as  the  complainant   does not want to  proceed  with  the case further against the O.Ps  after settled the matter amicably out of court and N.O.C has been  received  by the complainant  from the O.Ps  towards  loan account  No. 32941192762.    Parties are left  to bear their own cost.

Dictated and corrected by me.       Pronounced on this     25th..    Day of       February, 2021.

               

                                                                                Member.                                      President