Haryana

Karnal

CC/9/2022

Kusum Lata - Complainant(s)

Versus

The Branch Manager, Medi Assist Insurance TPA Private Limited - Opp.Party(s)

Jagdeep Singh

21 Sep 2023

ORDER

BEFORE THE DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, KARNAL.

                                                          Complaint.No.09 of 2022

                                                          Date of instt.07.01.2022

                                                          Date of Decision:21.09.2023

 

Kusum Lata wife of Sh. Isham Singh Arya, resident of house no.968-C, Sector-9, Urban Estate, Karnal.

          ...…Complainant.

                                        Versus

1. The Branch Manager, Medi Assist Insurance TPA Pvt., Ltd., 4^th, 5^th and 6^th floor, Aarpee Cambers Shgagbaug, off. Andheri Kurala road Marol. Andheri East, Mumbai-400059, through its local office SCO no.354, ground floor, Mugal Canal, Karnal.
2. The Managing Director, the New India Assurance Company Limited, Mumbai regional office III, New India Centre, 2^nd floor 17-A, Cooperage road Mumbai-40001.

 

                        ....Opposite parties.

  Complaint under Section 35 of Consumer Protection Act, 2019.

Before    Sh. Jaswant Singh………President. 

                Sh. Vineet Kaushik……… Member.

                Dr. Rekha Chaudhary……..Member.

               

Present:   None for the complainant.

                OP-1 exparte vide order dated 21.09.2022.

        Sh. Mohit Goyal, counsel for the OP-2.

                                 

               Today the case is fixed for evidence of the complainant, subject to the last opportunity. Case called several times since morning but none has put into appearance on behalf of the complainant. It is already 04:00 PM. No further wait is justified.

                A careful perusal of the file reveals that in the present complaint, the written version has been filed by the OP-2 on 18.10.2022 and the case was adjourned for evidence of complainant. Thereafter, the complainant has availed several effective opportunities including last opportunity for leading her evidence but the complainant has failed to conclude the same. It appears that the complainant is no more interested to pursue the present complaint.

                Further adjournment for the same purpose would not be justified as it would amount to wastage of precious time of this Commission.

                Hence, in view the above facts, the present complaint is hereby dismissed for want of prosecution. However, complainant is at liberty to file fresh complaint on the same cause of action in the court of competent jurisdiction, if so desired. Parties concerned be communicated of the order accordingly and file be consigned to the record room.

Announced
Dated:21.09.2023.            

                     President,       

District Consumer Disputes

Redressal Commission, Karnal.

(Vineet Kaushik)   (Dr. Rekha Chaudhary) 

  Member                Member