The Branch Manager, Life Assurance Corproation of India, Raichur V/S Smt. Vijayalaxmi W/o. Hanumatha Reddy @ Hanumanthappa Reddy, Lingasugur - Consumer Court Case

Karnataka

Raichur

CC/11/4

Smt. Vijayalaxmi W/o. Hanumatha Reddy @ Hanumanthappa Reddy, Lingasugur - Complainant(s)

Versus

The Branch Manager, Life Assurance Corproation of India, Raichur - Opp.Party(s)

Smt. Vijayalaxmi

22 Mar 2011

ORDER

Dist. Consumer Disputes Redressal Forum, Sath Kacheri, Raichur.
Dist. Consumer Disputes Redressal Forum, Sath Kacheri, Raichur.
consumer case(CC) No. CC/11/4

Smt. Vijayalaxmi W/o. Hanumatha Reddy @ Hanumanthappa Reddy, Lingasugur						...........Appellant(s)
Vs.
The Branch Manager, Life Assurance Corproation of India, Raichur The Divisional Manager, Life Assurance Corporatin of India, Raichur						...........Respondent(s)

BEFORE:

Complainant(s)/Appellant(s):

OppositeParty/Respondent(s):

Consumer Court Lawyer

Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended

Highly recommended!

5.0 (615)

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended

Highly recommended!

Experties

Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes

Phone Number

7982270319

Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.

ORDER

ORDER The learned advocate for complainant and learned advocate for opposite are present. The learned advocate for opposite filed a memo alongwith a DD for Rs. 2,07,399/- dt. 18-03-2011 towards satisfaction of the claim amount and requested to close the complaint as claim is fully satisfied. The learned advocate for complainant filed another memo to dismiss the complaint, as not pressed in view of the depositing the amount of Rs. 2,07,399/-. In view of the submissions mde on both sides, the Shirestedar is directed to take the amount of DD to the office Account and this complaint is dismised as not pressed in view of the depositing of the said claim amount. (Dictated to the Stenographer, typed, corrected and then pronounced in the open Forum on 22-03-2011) Smt.Pratibha Rani Hiremath, Sri. Gururaj Sri. Pampapathi, Member. Member. President, Dist.Forum-Raichur. Dist-Forum-Raichur Dist-Forum-Raichur.

ORDER The learned advocate for complainant and learned advocate for opposite are present. The learned advocate for opposite filed a memo alongwith a DD for Rs. 2,07,399/- dt. 18-03-2011 towards satisfaction of the claim amount and requested to close the complaint as claim is fully satisfied. The learned advocate for complainant filed another memo to dismiss the complaint, as not pressed in view of the depositing the amount of Rs. 2,07,399/-. In view of the submissions mde on both sides, the Shirestedar is directed to take the amount of DD to the office Account and this complaint is dismised as not pressed in view of the depositing of the said claim amount. (Dictated to the Stenographer, typed, corrected and then pronounced in the open Forum on 22-03-2011) Smt.Pratibha Rani Hiremath, Sri. Gururaj Sri. Pampapathi, Member. Member. President, Dist.Forum-Raichur. Dist-Forum-Raichur Dist-Forum-Raichur.