Tamil Nadu

StateCommission

FA/154/2013

Sangeetha - Complainant(s)

Versus

The Branch Manager, Corporation Bank & 2 Ors. - Opp.Party(s)

K. Ganesan,

02 Aug 2018

ORDER

Heading1
Heading2
 
First Appeal No. FA/154/2013
( Date of Filing : 02 May 2013 )
(Arisen out of Order Dated 14/03/2013 in Case No. Complaint Case No. CC/33/2013 of District Salem)
 
1. Sangeetha
199, HARE KRISHNA SALAI, SANKAR NAGAR, NEAR NATIONAL HOTEL, SALEM-636 007
...........Appellant(s)
Versus
1. The Branch Manager, Corporation Bank & 2 Ors.
SEVAPET, SALEM-636 002
2. CORPORATION BANK, THE ZONAL HEAD
ZONAL OFFICE, RENGA WESTEND, NSR ROAD, SAIBABA COLONY, COIMBATORE-641 011
COIMBATORE
TAMILNADU
3. CORPORATION BANK, THE CHAIRMAN AND MANAGING DIRECTOR
CORPORATE OFFICE, MANGALADEVI TEMPLE ROAD, MANGALORE-575 001
...........Respondent(s)
 
BEFORE: 
 HON'BLE MR. K BASKARAN PRESIDING MEMBER
 HON'BLE MRS. TMT.Dr.S.M.LATHA MAHESHWARI MEMBER
 
For the Appellant:
For the Respondent:
Dated : 02 Aug 2018
Final Order / Judgement

IN THE STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, CHENNAI

BEFORE    Thiru.K.BASKARAN       PRESIDING JUDICIAL  MEMBER

                 Tmt.Dr.S.M.Latha Maheswari                           MEMBER

 

F.A.154/2013

(Against the order passed in CCSR.No.33/2013, dated 14.03.2013 on the file of the District Forum, Salem )

THIS THURSDAY DATED THE 2nd DAY OF AUGUST 2018

Smt.Sangeetha,

W/o.Thangavelu,

199, Hare Krishna Salai,

Sankar Nagar, Near National Hotel,

Salem – 636 007.                                                     ..Appellant/complainant.

                                           Vs

 

1.       The Branch Manager,

Corporation Bank,

Sevapet, Salem – 636 002.

 

2.       The Zonal Head,

Zonal Office,

Corporation Bank,

Renga westend, NSR Road,

Saibaba Colony,

Coimbatore – 641 011.

 

  1. The Chairman and Managing Director,                                         Corporation Bank, Corporate Office,

Mangaladevi Temple Road,

Mangalore – 575 001.                          ..Respondents/opposite parties.

 

Counsel for Appellant/complainant           : Party in person.

Counsel for Respondents/opposite parties  : Mr.N.Venkateswarn.

 

        This appeal is coming before this commission for hearing today, this commission made the following order in open court:

 

                                             Docket order

 

          No representation for both. In the last hearing, the matter was specifically posted for appearance of appellant, or for dismissal. Today also there is no representation for the appellant. Appellant is also called absent, thereby showing that the appellant is not interested in prosecuting the case. The appeal was filed during the year 2013. Now almost five years completed. But the appellant had not taken any efforts to conduct the case. Therefore no useful purpose will be served in keeping the appeal on file. Hence the appeal is dismissed for non-prosecution.

         Sd/-  xxxx                                                  Sd/- xxxx

  S.M.LATHA MAHESWARI                                      K.BASKARAN

          MEMBER                                                     PRESIDING JUDL.MEMBER

 

 
 
[HON'BLE MR. K BASKARAN]
PRESIDING MEMBER
 
[HON'BLE MRS. TMT.Dr.S.M.LATHA MAHESHWARI]
MEMBER

Consumer Court Lawyer

Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!

Experties

Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes

Phone Number

7982270319

Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.