Orissa

Rayagada

CC/103/2021

Krushna Chandra Ganta - Complainant(s)

Versus

The Branch manager, Chjolamandalam Finance Ltd., - Opp.Party(s)

Self

08 Feb 2023

ORDER

DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, RAYAGADA, ODISHA.

 

Present:                                              1. Sri Rajendra Kumar Panda, President.

           2. Sri Satish Kumar Panigrahi, Member.

                                                           

                                                            Consumer Complaint No. –103 / 2021

Date of Institution: 05.07.2021

   Date of Final Hearing: 8.02.2023

 

Sri  Krushsna  Chandra  Ghanta,  S/O: Late Murali Ghanta, At:Katalang, Po:Sikarpai,   Dist: Rayagada,  State:Odisha, 765 017.  Cell No.9437721002.                                                                                                                        …Complainant.

Versus

1.The Branch Manager, Cholomandalam Investment and  Financial Co.Ltd., Near Union Bank, Po/Dist: Rayagada.

2.The Regional Manager, Cholomandalam Investment and  Financial Co.Ltd., Dare house, Ist. Floor, No.2 NSC Bose Road, Parrys, Chennai- 600  001.                                                                                                                  …O.Ps/Respondents.

• Representative for the complainant     ...Self..
• Representative   for the O.Ps.              ... Sri Ram  Prasad Patra,Advocate, Rayagada.
• Date of  Pronouncement                      ...8.02.2023

Sri  Rajendra  Kumar  Panda, President.

Brief facts of the case:-

Case in hand is the allegation of  deficiency in service and unfair trade practice by the O.Ps    not to seize the vehicle  Maruti Dzire VXI  bearing   Regd. No. OD-18-G-0405     Manufacturing   year 2019  and  to receive the E.M.I.  amount as and when deposited by the complainant and waive out the  over due penal interest for  which  the complainant sought  redressal.

On being noticed the O.Ps  appeared before this commission through their learned counsel  and filed  written version.

During the course of  hearing  the complainant is  absent on repeated call though notices has been duly served upon him.

On perusal of the documents it is revealed that despite several adjournments taken  by the complainant for the purpose of filing relevant papers, the complainant failed to produce any documents in support of his claim.  When the pleading of  the complainant in support of his claim have been denied by the  O.P. the complainant is duty bound   to substantiate his claim by producing relevant documents there for, but he has failed to do so.  On the basis of mere pleadings of the complainant, without any supporting  evidence, no positive finding can be recorded in regard to his claim. Hence, we are constrained to hold that the petition made by the complainant  is  devoid of any merit.

The complainant failed to perform his obligatory  duty to remain present  and adduce evidence.

                                                            ORDER

In the result this commission dismiss the  complaint for default U/S- 38(3)© of the C.P.Act,2019

Miscellaneous  order if any  delivered by this  commission  relating to this case  stands vacated. 

 A copy of this order be provided to all the parties at  free of cost as mandated by the Consumer Protection Act,  2019 or they may download same from the confonet.nic.in to treat the same as if copy of order received from this Commission.

The judgment be uploaded forthwith on the website of the Commission for the perusal of the parties.

File be consigned to the record room along with a copy of this Judgment.

MEMBER.                                                                            PRESIDENT.

Order dictated and corrected by me and pronounced in the open court on this   8th.. Day of  February, 2023 under our signature & seal of this commission.

MEMBER.                                                                            PRESIDENT