Maharashtra

StateCommission

A/06/2397

Shri. Dharmendra Ashvinkumar Shaha - Complainant(s)

Versus

The Administrator, Shri. Ganesh Vyapari Nagari - Opp.Party(s)

12 Apr 2012

ORDER

BEFORE THE HON'BLE STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL
COMMISSION, MAHARASHTRA, MUMBAI
 
First Appeal No. A/06/2397
(Arisen out of Order Dated 25/09/2006 in Case No. 333 to 334/05 of District Kolhapur)
 
1. Shri. Dharmendra Ashvinkumar Shaha
R/o. Peth Vadgaon, Tal. Hatkangale, Dist. Kolhapur
2. Shri. Ashok Janadaran Petkar
R/o. Peth Vadgaon, Tal. Hatkangale, Dist. Kolhapur
Kolhapur
Maharashtra
3. Shri. Rajendra Bapuso Mane
R/o. Peth Vadgaon, Tal. Hatkangale, Dist. Kolhapur
Kolhapur
Maharashtra
4. Shri. Prajot Ramanlal Shaha
R/o. Peth Vadgaon, Tal. Hatkangale, Dist. Kolhapur
Kolhapur
Maharashtra
5. Shri. Shital Sundra Honole
R/o. Peth Vadgaon, Tal. Hatkangale, Dist. Kolhapur
Kolhapur
Maharashtra
6. Shri. Subhash Anandrao Mehatar
R/o. Peth Vadgaon, Tal. Hatkangale, Dist. Kolhapur
Kolhapur
Maharashtra
7. Shri. Sunil Kishappa Mehatar
R/o. Peth Vadgaon, Tal. Hatkangale, Dist. Kolhapur
Kolhapur
Maharashtra
8. Shri. Pradip Shantilal Rathod
R/o. Peth Vadgaon, Tal. Hatkangale, Dist. Kolhapur
Kolhapur
Maharashtra
9. Shri. Manohar Bandopant Belekar
R/o. Peth Vadgaon, Tal. Hatkangale, Dist. Kolhapur
Kolhapur
Maharashtra
10. Sanyama Ramesh Mudhale
R/o. Peth Vadgaon, Tal. Hatkangale, Dist. Kolhapur
Kolhapur
Maharashtra
11. .
.
...........Appellant(s)
Versus
1. The Administrator, Shri. Ganesh Vyapari Nagari
Sahakari Pat Sanstha Maryadit, Peth Vadgaon, Tal. Hatkangale, Dist. Kolhapur
2. Shri. Baburao Mahadev Patil
R/o. Khochi, Tal. Hatkangale, Dist. Kolhapur
Kolhapur
Maharashtra
...........Respondent(s)
 
BEFORE: 
 Hon'ble Mr. S.R. Khanzode PRESIDING MEMBER
 Hon'ble Mr. Narendra Kawde MEMBER
 
PRESENT:
Both parties are absent.
 ......for the Appellant
 
ORDER

Per Shri S.R. Khanzode, Hon’ble Presiding Judicial Member

          Appellants and their Counsel are remaining absent.  They also failed to take effective steps to prosecute this appeal by issuing notice to the respondent as per our direction dated 05/01/2012.  Appellants also failed to comply the direction to give additional sets of appeal compilation to this Commission. Hence, the following order :-

                   -: ORDER :-

1.       Appeal stands dismissed for default.

2.       No order as to costs.

3.       Copies of the order be furnished to the parties.

Pronounced

Dated 12th April 2012.

 

 
 
[Hon'ble Mr. S.R. Khanzode]
PRESIDING MEMBER
 
[Hon'ble Mr. Narendra Kawde]
MEMBER

Consumer Court Lawyer

Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!

Experties

Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes

Phone Number

7982270319

Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.