Kerala

Kasaragod

CC/15/29

Ajith Kumar K - Complainant(s)

Versus

Tata Motors Finance Ltd. - Opp.Party(s)

K. Abdul Nasir

23 Feb 2016

ORDER

C.D.R.F. Kasaragod
Kerala
 
Complaint Case No. CC/15/29
 
1. Ajith Kumar K
S/o Kunhiraman, R/at. Kollikkal House, Bellur Post, Mulleria
Kasaragod
Kerala
...........Complainant(s)
Versus
1. Tata Motors Finance Ltd.
The Manager, Opp: Ramananda Oil Mill, South Bazar,Kannur - 670002
Kannur
Kerala
2. Shakthi Motors
The Manager, Anangoor
Kasaragod
Kerala
............Opp.Party(s)
 
BEFORE: 
 HON'BLE MRS. P.RAMADEVI PRESIDENT
 HONABLE MRS. Beena.K.G. MEMBER
 HON'BLE MRS. Shiba.M.Samuel MEMBER
 
For the Complainant:
For the Opp. Party:
ORDER

D.o.F; 3/2/15

D.o.O:23/2/16

IN THE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM, KASARAGOD

                                                    CC.NO.29/15

                             Dated this, the 23rd     day of February 2016

PRESENT:

SMT.P.RAMADEVI            : PRESIDENT

SMT.BEENA K.G               : MEMBER

SMT.SHIBA.M.SAMUEL    : MEMBER

Ajith Kumar.k  S/o  Kunhiraman,

R/at  at Kollikkal  House, Bellur Po

Mulleria, Kasaragod.   Dt.                                                     : Complainant

 (Adv.Shafi.M)

 

 1.  Manager, TATA Motors  Finance .Ltd ,                           : Opposite parties

     Opp. Ramananda Oil Mill, , South Bazar, Kannur 670002.

2.  Manager,  TATA Motors  Finance .Ltd,

    Shakthi Motors, Anangoor, Kasaragod.

 

                                                            ORDER

SMT.P.RAMADEVI      : PRESIDENT

    Opposite parties raised an issue regarding  the maintainability of the complaint before this forum in the light of the order passed by the Hon’ble National Commission  in Magna Fincorp.Ltd & others vs Praveen  Benson  & others (RP.No.1936/15) dtd. 3/11/2015.

   That the contention of the opposite party  that the complaint is barred by principles of res judicata  since  the arbitration award is  passed in respect of the same  subject matter and the complainant is not maintainable before this Forum.

  Heard both sides.  In this case an arbitration  award  is passed in respect of the same subject matter. The observation of the Hon’ble National Commission is  “ in view of the decision of the Arbitrator which is binding on parties, the forum below should not have passed an order by over looking the award”.

    On going through the above decision of the Hon’ble National Commission and on perusal of  the documents , we are of the view that the complaint is barred by principles of resjudicata and hence it is not maintainable before this Forum.  Therefore the   complaint is dismissed  .  No order as to cost.

Sd/                                                                           Sd/                                                                          Sd/

MEMBER                                                    MEMBER                                                     PRESIDENT

eva                                                            /forwarded by order/

                                                                                      Sd/

                                                                   SENIOR SUPERINTENDENT

 

 
 
[HON'BLE MRS. P.RAMADEVI]
PRESIDENT
 
[HONABLE MRS. Beena.K.G.]
MEMBER
 
[HON'BLE MRS. Shiba.M.Samuel]
MEMBER

Consumer Court Lawyer

Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!

Experties

Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes

Phone Number

7982270319

Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.