Petitioner on payment of Rs.3,641/- got installed an internet connection for purpose of online trading of shares.  Alleging deficiency on part of respondent – company, for connection, getting frequently disconnected and speed of connection being slow, a consumer complaint was filed.  Grievance of petitioner was also that despite complaint being lodged, no one attended to complaint. The claim of petitioner was resisted by respondent – company stating that disruption in service was due to frequent cable cuts by unidentified mischievous elements and that apart renewal of contract itself is evidence of satisfaction of petitioner with service of respondent.  As for grievance of petitioner that the procedure prescribed in Section 65B (4) (a) was not followed in the proceeding was also devoid of substance.  Needless to say that though proceeding before Consumer Fora has trappings of Civil Court, it is neither a revenue  Court nor required to follow all the procedure laid down in Civil Procedure Court. Both the fora below have recorded a concurrent finding dismissing complaint of petitioner.   We find no good reason to interfere with impugned order and revision petition, in the circumstances,  is accordingly  dismissed with no order as to cost.