West Bengal

Kolkata-III(South)

CC/232/2023

SMT. LALITA SHIL - Complainant(s)

Versus

TARAMA UDYOG - Opp.Party(s)

SUVENDU DAS

25 Jun 2024

ORDER

DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTE REDRESSAL COMMISSION
KOLKATA UNIT-III(South),West Bengal
18, Judges Court Road, Kolkata 700027
 
Complaint Case No. CC/232/2023
( Date of Filing : 18 May 2023 )
 
1. SMT. LALITA SHIL
W/O Late Umesh Shil residing at 41, Gobindapur Road, P.S. Lake, Dist-South 24 Parganas, Kol-45.
2. Sri Sambhu Shil
S/O Late Umesh Shil residing at 41, Gobindapur Road, P.S. Lake, Dist-South 24 Parganas, Kol-45.
...........Complainant(s)
Versus
1. TARAMA UDYOG
a proprietorship firm having its office at 84C, Selimpur Road, P.S. Garfa, Kol-31.
2. Sri Marjit Chakraborty
S/O Shyam Sundar Chakraborty represented as a sole proprietor of Tarama Udyog and residing at 84C, Selimpur Road, P.S. Garfa, Kol-31.
3. Sri Kaushik Das Gupta
S/O Late Pranab Das Gupta residing at 2/48, Sahid Nagar, P.S. Garfa, Kol-31.
4. Sri Ratul Das Gupta
S/O Late Pranab Das Gupta residing at 2/48, Sahid Nagar, P.S. Garfa, Kol-31.
5. Sri Soumik Das Gupta
S/O Late Basudev Das Gupta residing at 2/48, Sahid Nagar, P.S. Garfa, Kol-31.
6. Smt Nayana Sen Gupta
W/O Sri Sisir Sen Gupta residing at 2, B.G. Lane, Govt. Qtr. Dl, P.O. Shibpur, Botanical Garden, Howrah-711103.
............Opp.Party(s)
 
BEFORE: 
 HON'BLE MRS. Monihar Begum PRESIDING MEMBER
 HON'BLE MR. Manish Deb MEMBER
 
PRESENT:
 
Dated : 25 Jun 2024
Final Order / Judgement

Date of Filing : 18/05/2023

Date of Judgment : 25/06/2024

Mrs. Monihar Begum, Hon’ble Presiding Member

BRIEF FACTS

The petitioners had made an agreement for sale on 04/12/2020 with OP No.1 & OP2 in respect of one self contained flat measuring about 750 sq.ft. of super built up area, more or less comprising two bed rooms, one drawing cum living room, one kitchen, one toilet, one verandah with all facilities and amenities at Premises No.19/1Z, Jheel Road, 2/48 Sahid Nagar, Kolkata-700031,P.S. Garfa, formerly Kasba, at a consideration of amount of Rs.18,00,000/- (Eighteen lacs) only out of which  the petitioners initially paid Rs.13,00,000/- (Thirteen lacs) only and which was duly acknowledged by issuing valid receipt to that effect by the said OPs.  OPs also agreed to deliver the said flat to the petitioners within 12 months from the date of agreement.

OP1 & OP2 failed to complete the project till date. Petitioners on several occasions requested the said OPs to settle the matter on negotiations and also for refund of the money but the OPs had the intention to deceive and defraud the petitioners withholding the said amount of Rs.13,00,000/-(Thirteen lacs) and the said act and conducts on the part of the OP1 & OP2 amounts to deficiency in service and unfair trade practice.

OPs did not contest the case by filing written version.

Point of consideration is whether the petitioners are entitled to any relief(s).

FINDINGS

Petitioners produced their evidence on affidavit and also the documents including the agreement for sale dated 04.12.2020 from which we found the said agreement was entered into by the petitioners and the OP No.1 & 2/Developers of the project where the petitioners had booked their flat. In the written argument, the petitioners stated all the facts. 

It was further found from the documents produced by the petitioners that OPs had also agreed to refund the entire amount of Rs.13,00,000/- (Thirteen lacs) which was paid for the flat.  It was further found that OP admitted the amount having been paid to them by the petitioners but they had failed and neglected to complete the project work within the stipulated period as per Agreement for Sale dated 04.12.2020. 

Petitioners claimed refund of the said amount from the OPs in this case. 

We think, considering the materials on record, petitioners are entitled to get refund of the said amount along with interest @9% p.a. from the date of agreement i.e. 04.12.2020 and also entitled to get Rs.50,000/- for mental pain and agony and Rs.10,000/- for litigation cost.  It is OP No.1 & OP2 who are liable to pay the said amount.  As OP3, OP4, OP5 & OP6 are landowners who did not get money from the petitioners, instant case against them is liable to be dismissed.

Accordingly it is

                                        ORDERED

The instant complaint case is allowed exparte against the OP1 & OP2 and dismiss against OP3 to OP6.

OP No.1 & OP No.2 are liable to pay the entire amount.

OP No.1 & OP No.2 are hereby directed to pay the amount of Rs.13,00,000/-(Thirteen lacs) along with interest @9% p.a. from the date 04.12.2020 to the petitioners within 30 days from the date of this order.

Opposite Parties are also directed to pay Rs.50,000/- for mental pain and agony and Rs.10,000/- for litigation cost to the petitioners. Also within the said period.

The aforesaid payment shall be made by the opposite parties within 45 days from the date of this order failing which the petitioners shall be at liberty to proceed in accordance with law.

And also if the ordered is not complied by the said OPs within the above period they are liable to pay the interest of the entire amount @Rs.12% p./a. until realization.

 

Directed and corrected by me

 

          Member

 
 
[HON'BLE MRS. Monihar Begum]
PRESIDING MEMBER
 
 
[HON'BLE MR. Manish Deb]
MEMBER
 

Consumer Court Lawyer

Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!

Experties

Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes

Phone Number

7982270319

Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.