TAMIL NADU STATE TRANSPORT CORPORATION & ORS. V/S M.A. RAHEEM - Consumer Court Case

NCDRC

RP/4440/2009

M.A. RAHEEM - Complainant(s)

Versus

TAMIL NADU STATE TRANSPORT CORPORATION & ORS. - Opp.Party(s)

IN PERSON

08 Feb 2010

ORDER


NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHIREVISION PETITION NO. 4440 OF 2009
(Against the Order dated 25/02/2008 in Appeal No. 207/2002 of the State Commission Tamil Nadu)

1. M.A. RAHEEM84/11,Mariamman Koil Street, Tiruvannamalai Town, Tiruvannamalai District. Tiruvannamalai						...........Petitioner(s)
Versus
1. TAMIL NADU STATE TRANSPORT CORPORATION & ORS.The Managing Director, Tamil Nadu State Transport Corporation, Villupuram Division-I Ltd. Villupuram. Villupuram2. M.RAMAMURTHYDriver No.1415,Tamil Nadu State Transport Corporation,Villupuram Division-I Ltd.Villupuram3. R.KALIA PERUMALConductor No.1011,Tamil Nadu State Transport Corporation,Villupuram Division-I Ltd.Villupuram						...........Respondent(s)

BEFORE:

MR. B.V. SHARMA ,REGISTRAR

For the Petitioner :

IN PERSON

For the Respondent :

NEMO

Dated : 08 Feb 2010

ORDER

Consumer Court Lawyer

Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended

Highly recommended!

5.0 (615)

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended

Highly recommended!

Experties

Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes

Phone Number

7982270319

Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.

None present for the Petitioner. The case of the Petitioner/Complainant is that the Petitioner is 70 years of age. He boarded the Bus intended to travel upto Tiruvannamalai. The Complainant has paid Rs.20/- to the conductor and demanded travelling ticket upto Tiruvannamalai. He also alleged that Complainant delivered a ticket for Rs.7/- only and failed to return the balance amount of Rs.13/-. The Complainant was travelling in the bus lieing on the seat thought on fond hope that the conductor would make an alarm when the bus would reach Tiruvannamalai. Instead of the stand of Tiruvannamalai, conductor forced the Complainant to get down from the bus after 6 kms. from Tiruvannamalai. Petitioner contended that he has expressed his readiness to pay additional fare for the next stop i.e. Chengam. But he was compelled to get down at the lonely place even without handover the balance amount of Rs.13/-. The Petitioner filed a complaint before the District Forum praying for Rs.77,513/-. The break of Rs.77,513/- is as under:- For physical suffering mental agony and other deficiency Rs.75,000.00 Balance amount apart actual fare Rs. 13.00 Litigation expenses Rs. 2,500.00 ____________ Rs.77,513.00 ____________ We perused the orders of District Forum and State Commission. There is absolutely no piece of evidence to prove the contention of the Petitioner. One can see from the grounds filed in the revision petition that Petitioner being 70 years old man must have been harassed by this incident but without any evidence it is very difficult to uphold his contentions. In view of the aforesaid discussions, the revision petition is dismissed with no order as to costs.

......................B.V. SHARMAREGISTRAR