Tamil Nadu

Thiruvallur

CC/20/2013

S.Jayachandran Sub Inspector of Police - Complainant(s)

Versus

Tamil Nadu Govt Staff Welfare,Council - Opp.Party(s)

M/s, M .Baskaran

19 Jun 2015

ORDER

DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM
THIRUVALLUR
No.1-D, C.V.NAIDU SALAI, 1st CROSS STREET,
THIRUVALLUR-602 001
 
Miscellaneous Application No. CC/20/2013
In
 
1. S.Jayachandran Sub Inspector of Police
87,T.P.Chatram Police Quarters,Kilpauk ,Chennai-10
...........Appellant(s)
Versus
1. Tamil Nadu Govt Staff Welfare,Council
31-A,Old Police Stataion Compound,Varadharajapuram,Ambattur,Chennai
...........Respondent(s)
 
BEFORE: 
  THIRU.S.PANDIAN, B.Sc., L.L.M., PRESIDENT
  Tmt.S.Sujatha, B.Sc., MEMBER
  Mr.V.VENKATESAN, M.A., B.Ed., MBA.,M.Phil.,B.L MEMBER
 
For the Appellant:M/s, M .Baskaran, Advocate
For the Respondent: M/s V.Murali, Advocate
ORDER

                                             Filed On  :        23.04.2013

Disposed On :  19.06.2015

DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM, THIRUVALLUR

     PRESENT; THIRU. S. PANDIAN, B.Sc., L.L.M.,                           :  PRESIDENT

                         TMT.    S.  SUJATHA, B.SC.,                                     :   MEMBER-I

              THIRU. V.  VENKATESAN, M.A.B.Ed., MBA. M.PHIL.B.L.  :   MEMBER-II

 

Friday, the Day of  19th June- 2015

CC. No. 20 /2013

 

S. Jayachandran

Sub Inspector of Police

No. 87, T.P. Chatram Police Quarters,

Kilpauk, Chennai – 10.                                                                            …Complainant

-Vs-

Tamil Nadu Government Staff Welfare Council

Rep. by its Secretary

No. 31-A Old Police Station Compound

Varadarajapuram

Ambattur, Chennai – 53.                                                                         …Opposite party

 

Counsel For Complainant                         :   M/s. M. Baskaran, Advocate

Counsel For Opposite Party                     :  M/s. V. Murali, Advocate

 

ORDER

 

ORDER PRONOUNCED BY THIRU. S. PANDIAN,   District Consumer Disputes Redressal Forum, Thiruvallur.

 

         Complainant is called absent.  No other representation till 12.20 P.M.  The Opposite Party is represented by the staff concerned and stated that the complainant is continuously absent for a long time.  It is noticed from the adjudication that the complainant is continuously absent from 16/12/2013 and not come forward to file the Proof affidavit on his side.  The counsel for the complainant is also not appeared continuously.  It clearly shows the disinterest of the complainant who being the police officials and literate and law abiding citizen.   Therefore there is no justification to prolong further without any progress.  Hence, the complaint is dismissed for default.  No Costs.

 

  Sd/-                                                                     Sd/-                                                   Sd/-

MEMBER – I                                                 MEMBER –II                                   PRESIDEN T

 
 
[ THIRU.S.PANDIAN, B.Sc., L.L.M.,]
PRESIDENT
 
[ Tmt.S.Sujatha, B.Sc.,]
MEMBER
 
[ Mr.V.VENKATESAN, M.A., B.Ed., MBA.,M.Phil.,B.L]
MEMBER

Consumer Court Lawyer

Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!

Experties

Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes

Phone Number

7982270319

Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.