Learned Counsel appearing for the Petitioner submits that as per his instructions, the Petitioner Company is willing to pay to Respondent No.1/Complainant the amount awarded in her favour by the District Forum, provided any kind of allegation of deficiency in service and unfair trade practice on its part is expunged, more so, when the Petitioner was not responsible for refund of the amount deposited by the Complainant with the Dealer as the booking advance.

In view of the submission, the Revision Petition is dismissed as not pressed, with the observation that since the obligation to refund the booking amount was upon the Dealer, it could not be held that there was deficiency on the part of the Petitioner/Manufacturer in rendering service to the Complainant or that it had indulged in unfair trade practice.  It is also clarified that if the Petitioner chooses to account for the amount, so refunded to the Complainant, with the Dealer, while settling their account, the dismissal of this Petition would not be any impediment.  The amount awarded in favour of the Complainant shall be remitted by the Petitioner within two weeks from today, by means of a demand draft drawn in her favour.

The Revision Petition stands disposed of in the above terms. 

Order dasti.