Kerala

Kottayam

CC/229/2019

K T Thomas - Complainant(s)

Versus

Suresh - Opp.Party(s)

18 Dec 2021

ORDER

Consumer Disputes Redressal Forum, Kottayam
Kottayam
 
Complaint Case No. CC/229/2019
( Date of Filing : 18 Dec 2019 )
 
1. K T Thomas
Kallukalathil ilamkadu P O Koottickal Kottayam
Kottayam
Kerala
...........Complainant(s)
Versus
1. Suresh
Classic Distributers, Enthayar P O, Kottayam
Kottayam
Kerala
2. Malabar Steels and Tubers
Pandiyamakkil Building, Moonippally P O Kottayam
Kottayam
Kerala
............Opp.Party(s)
 
BEFORE: 
 HON'BLE MR. V.S. Manulal PRESIDENT
 HON'BLE MRS. Bindhu R MEMBER
 HON'BLE MR. K.M.Anto MEMBER
 
PRESENT:
 
Dated : 18 Dec 2021
Final Order / Judgement

IN THE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, KOTTAYAM

Dated this the 18th day of December, 2021

 

Present:  Sri. Manulal V.S. President

Smt.  Bindhu R,  Member

Sri. K.M. Anto, Member

 

C C No. 229/2019 (filed on 18-12-2019)

 

Petitioner                                            :         K.T. Thomas,

                                                                   Kallukalathil,

                                                                   Ilamkad P.O. Koottikkal,

                                                                   Kottayam – 686514.

                                                                             Vs.                            

Opposite Parties                                 :   1)   Suresh,

                                                                   Classic Distributors,

                                                                   Enthayar P.O.

(Adv. Gayatri S. Nath and

Adv. Sony K. Thomas)

                                                                2) Malabar Steels and Tubes,

                                                                   Pandiyamakkil Building,

                                                                   Monippally P.O

                                                                   Kottayam – 686636.

                                                         (Adv. Teena Baby and Adv. Anie Mathew)

 

                                                          O  R  D  E  R

Sri. Manulal V.S. President

          Complainant absent.  No representation.  Opposite party 1 and 2 represented.  The complainant was continuously absent from the proceedings of the case.  Inspite of the receipt of repeated notice from this Commission, complainant did not care to appear before the Commission and to conduct his case.  Hence the complaint is dismissed for default.

    Pronounced in the Open Commission on this the 18th day of December, 2021.

               Sri. Manulal V.S. President   Sd/-  

              Smt.  Bindhu R,  Member      Sd/-

              Sri. K.M. Anto, Member        Sd/-            

 

                                                                                                                                                                                By Order

                                                                                                                                                                   Senior Superintendent

 
 
[HON'BLE MR. V.S. Manulal]
PRESIDENT
 
 
[HON'BLE MRS. Bindhu R]
MEMBER
 
 
[HON'BLE MR. K.M.Anto]
MEMBER
 

Consumer Court Lawyer

Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!

Experties

Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes

Phone Number

7982270319

Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.