No one appears on behalf of the R2 even on the second call. The R2 is, therefore, proceeded exparte. 2. Learned counsel for the R1 has filed his vakalatnama, which is taken on record. 3. This revision petition is directed against the impugned order of the State Commission dated 19.10.2012 whereby the appeal preferred by the petitioners dismissed for non-prosecution with following observations: n 6th February, 2012 Counsel for the Appellant was directed to file necessary amendment application impleading Mr. L. Anthony and Mr.Manpreet Singh as Appellant along with M/s. Honda Siel Cars India Ltd. and M/s. Hallmark Automotive Pvt. Ltd. Nothing is done. No application is filed as directed by us. Today Appellant is absent. Hence, appeal stands dismissed for default. 4. Learned counsel for the petitioners states that the petitioners were compelled to file this revision petition because in view of the law laid down by the Supreme Court the State Commission has no jurisdiction to review of its own order. Learned counsel for the petitioners further states that absence of the petitioners before the State Commission on 19.10.2013 was unintentional and it occurred because of confusion regarding date of hearing. Thus, he has urged for acceptance of the revision petition and remand the matter back to the State Commission for disposal of the appeal on merit. 5. Shri Vir Bhan Sharma, learned counsel for the respondent has fairly stated that the respondent has no objection, if the impugned order is set aside subject to the cost for delay and the matter is remanded to the State Commission for disposal of appeal on merit within a prescribed time schedule. 6. In view of the explanation given by the learned counsel for the petitioner and the concession given at the Bar by the counsel for the respondent, the revision petition is accepted, impugned order is set aside and the matter is remanded back to the State Commission for decision of appeal on merits subject to cost of Rs.10,000/- to be paid by the petitioners to the respondent no.1 by way of demand draft for the delay caused. 7. Parties are directed to appear before the State Commission on 29.11.2013. The State Commission is requested to dispose of the appeal within three months from the above noted date.