NCDRC

NCDRC

RP/254/2022

TELCO CONSTRUCTION EQUIPMENT CO. LTD. - Complainant(s)

Versus

SUFIYA BEGUM & 2 ORS. - Opp.Party(s)

M/S. R.B. ASSOCIATES

06 Dec 2024

ORDER

NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION
NEW DELHI
 
REVISION PETITION NO. 254 OF 2022
(Against the Order dated 03/02/2021 in Appeal No. 1229/2010 of the State Commission Uttar Pradesh)
1. TELCO CONSTRUCTION EQUIPMENT CO. LTD.
...........Petitioner(s)
Versus 
1. SUFIYA BEGUM & 2 ORS.
...........Respondent(s)

BEFORE: 
 HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE A. P. SAHI,PRESIDENT

FOR THE PETITIONER :
MR. SANDEEP KHATRI, ADVOCATE MR. RAJAT BHARDWAJ, ADVOCATE
MR. UJJWAL BHARDWAJ, ADVOCATE
FOR THE RESPONDENT :
FOR RESPONDENT NO. – 1 : MS. A. SUBHASHINI, ADVOCATE
FOR RESPONDENT NO. – 2 & 3 : DELETED VIDE ORDER DATED 29.11.2023

Dated : 06 December 2024
ORDER

Heard learned Counsel for the Petitioner and the learned Counsel for Respondent No. -1. The name of Respondent No. 2 and 3 have been deleted vide Order dated 29.11.2023.

Learned Counsel for the Parties have agreed for the final disposal of the matter as this Revision Petition involves a trivial issue pertaining to the dismissal of the Appeal in default on 03.02.2021. Accordingly the petition is being finally disposed off with the consent of learned counsel for the represented parties.

The Order impugned is extracted herein under:

“ File presented. Present learned advocate of Respondent number -1, Shri OP Srivastava. No one appeared on behalf of the appellant. Appeal is liable to be dismissed for non-appearance.

                   The appeal is accordingly dismissed.

          A copy of this order should be made available to the parties as per rules.”

The matter had been earlier taken up on 29.10.2024 and it was pointed out by the learned Counsel for Respondent No. 1 that the Appeal had also been earlier dismissed in default in 2018 and was again restored on an intervention by this Commission on 16.05.2018. As noted above, the Appeal was again dismissed in default on 03.02.2021 against which the present Revision Petition has been filed. After the matter was heard learned Counsel for the Petitioner states that a direction be issued to re-hear the matter after setting aside the Order and the Petitioner shall deposit the entire amount of Rs.16,20,000/- before the State Commission.

Having heard the learned Counsel for the Parties, this Revision Petition is allowed on payment of Rs.5,000/- cost to Respondent No. -1 and further subject to the deposit of Rs.16,20,000/- before the State Commission. The Order dated 03.02.2021 is set aside with a direction to the State Commission to hear the Appeal at the earliest preferably within a period of three months. The said deposit shall be subject to the outcome of the Appeal and the rights and contention of the respective Parties before the State Commission.

 
.........................J
A. P. SAHI
PRESIDENT

Consumer Court Lawyer

Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!

Experties

Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes

Phone Number

7982270319

Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.