West Bengal

Howrah

MA/83/2022

Samsung India Electronics Pvt. Ltd., - Complainant(s)

Versus

SUDESHNA HAZRA, - Opp.Party(s)

06 Jan 2023

ORDER

DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION HOWRAH
20, Round Tank Lane, Howrah 711 101.
Office (033) 2638 0892, 0512 Confonet (033) 2638 0512 Fax (033) 2638 0892
 
Miscellaneous Application No. MA/83/2022
( Date of Filing : 06 Dec 2022 )
In
Complaint Case No. CC/194/2022
 
1. Samsung India Electronics Pvt. Ltd.,
Head Office Gurgaon Sector 43, Gurgaon, Delhi 122 002.
2. Samsung India Electronics Pvt. Ltd.,
DLF-I IT Park, 10th Floor, Action Area I, Rajarhat, AF Block (New Town), Action Area I, New Town, West Bengal 700 156.
...........Appellant(s)
Versus
1. SUDESHNA HAZRA,
Wife of Sri Bivas Hazra, Birajmoyee Road, P.S. Dasnagar, Howrah 711 105
...........Respondent(s)
 
BEFORE: 
 HON'BLE MR. Sankar Kumar Ghosh PRESIDENT
 HON'BLE MRS. Smt. Babita Chaudhuri MEMBER
 HON'BLE MR. Subir Kumar Dass MEMBER
 
PRESENT:
 
Dated : 06 Jan 2023
Final Order / Judgement

Order No:   2                                                                                       Date:06/01/2023

       Ld. Advocate of Petitioners/O.p. nos.1 & 2 is present Ld. Advocate of O.p. nos.3 to 5 is present.  Ld. Advocate of O.p./complainant is also present. Instant M.A. case is taken for hearing. Heard the Ld. Advocate of the Petitioner/O.p. nos.1 & 2 and Ld. Advocate of O.p./complainant in full.

       It is alleged in the said petition of the petitioners that Petitioner/O.p. no.2 had already shifted from the address mentioned in the original petition of complaint in C.C. case No.194/2022 and by making annexure petitioners files one copy of document.

       Ld. Advocate of the petitioners submits that O.p./complainant may be directed to file amended complaint in view of the changing of complaint of petitioner/O.p. no.2.

       Ld. Advocate of O.p./complainant has vehemently opposed the submission advanced by the Ld. Counsel of the petitioners/O.p. nos.1 & 2 and contended that when Petitioners/O.p. nos.1 & 2 know all such facts they did not come forward in advance which means knowingfully well they tried to kill/waste the time and to harass the O.p./complainant and it is crystal clear that from the very beginning entire fact regarding this case instituted by the O.p./complainant are within knowledge of Petitioner/O.p. nos.1 & 2 and as such instant case is liable to be dismissed.

       Considering the entire scenario we find merit and force in the submission of Ld. Counsel of O.p./complainant and considering the materials on record we are of the view the instant M.A. case is liable to be dismissed of contest. Accordingly we do that.

Dictated & corrected by me.       

 

President

 
 
[HON'BLE MR. Sankar Kumar Ghosh]
PRESIDENT
 
 
[HON'BLE MRS. Smt. Babita Chaudhuri]
MEMBER
 
 
[HON'BLE MR. Subir Kumar Dass]
MEMBER
 

Consumer Court Lawyer

Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!

Experties

Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes

Phone Number

7982270319

Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.