Learned counsel for the respondent submitted that he would be filing his vakalatnama with the Registry today. Heard learned counsel for the parties. Learned State Commission vide order dated 13.03.2012 dismissed the appeal of the petitioner in default in the presence of counsel for the respondent. Learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that on account of traffic jam he could not reach to the State Commission in time and the appeal was dismissed. Learned counsel for the respondent submitted that earlier also the appeal has been dismissed in default but later on the learned State Commission restored the appeal. Learned counsel for the respondent submitted that these facts have not been mentioned in the Memo of Revision. But, perusal of para 10 of the present petition reveals that the petitioner has mentioned about the fact of earlier dismissal in default and restoration by the State Commission. In such circumstances, as the appeal has been dismissed in default of petitioner on account of traffic jam, we deem it proper to restore the appeal subject to payment of cost. Consequently, the revision petition is allowed and order dated 13.03.2012 passed by the State Commission in F.A. No.659/2009 is set aside subject to payment of Rs.5,000/- as cost to the respondent and the appeal is restored to its original number and matter is remanded back to the State Commission for disposing the appeal on merits after giving opportunity of being heard to both the parties. Parties are directed to appear before the State Commission on 30.10.2012.