Haryana

Karnal

CC/510/2021

Anil Kumar - Complainant(s)

Versus

Star Health And Allied Insurance Company Limited - Opp.Party(s)

Manoj Dhakwala

14 Jun 2023

ORDER

BEFORE THE DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, KARNAL.

                                                          Complaint.No.510 of 2021

                                                          Date of instt.16.09.2021

                                                          Date of Decision:14.06.2023

 

Anil Kumar son of Sh. Har Bhagwan R/o house no.33 AB, ward no.5, doctor wali gali, village Rasulpur Kalan, District Karnal.

          ...…Complainant

                                        Versus

  1. Star Health and Allied Insurance Company Limited, through its Manager, SCF No.137, 22nd floor, above ICICI Bank, Sector-13, Karnal.
  2. Griveance Redressal Officer, Corporate Grievance Department, Star Health and Allied Insurance Company Limited, 1 New Tank street, Vailiuvar Kottam high road, Nungambakkam, Chennai-600034.
  3. Virk Hospital Pvt., Ltd., 363-364, Randhir Lane, near Dayal Singh College, Karnal, through its Director.

 

                        ....Opposite parties.

          

Complaint under Section 35 of Consumer Protection Act, 2019.

Before      Sh. Jaswant Singh………President. 

                Sh. Vineet Kaushik……… Member.

                Dr. Rekha Chaudhary……..Member.

               

Present:  None for the complainant.

                Sh. Naveen Khetarpal, counsel for the OPs-1 & 2.

                Sh. G.P.Singh, counsel for the OP-3.

                                 

                Today the case is fixed for evidence of the complainant, subject to the third last opportunity. Neither none has appeared on behalf of complaiant nor evidence on behalf of complainant has been produced. Case called several times since morning but none has appeared on behalf of the complainant. It is already 04:00 PM. No wait is justified.

                   A careful perusal of the file reveals that in the present complaint, the written version has been filed by the OPs-1 & 2 on 24.02.2022 and OP-3 on 28.03.2022 and the case was adjourned for evidence of complainant. Thereafter, the complainant has availed five effective opportunities including last opportunity for leading his evidence but the complainant has failed to conclude the same. It appears that the complainant is no more interested to pursue the present complaint.

                   Further adjournment for the same purpose would not be justified at it would amount to wastage of precious time of this Commission.

                   Hence, in view the above facts, the present complaint is hereby dismissed for want of prosecution. However, complainant is at liberty to file fresh complaint on the same cause of action in the court of competent jurisdiction, if so desired. Parties concerned be communicated of the order accordingly and file be consigned to the record room.

Announced
Dated:14.06.2023.            

                        President, 

District Consumer Disputes

Redressal Commission, Karnal.

 

(Vineet Kaushik)   (Dr. Rekha Chaudhary) 

  Member                Member         

Consumer Court Lawyer

Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!

Experties

Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes

Phone Number

7982270319

Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.