
SHAIK ABDUL KHALEEQ filed a consumer case on 28 Sep 2016 against SRIRAM GENERAL INSURANCE COM.LTD SITUPURA JAIPUR 302022 in the Bidar Consumer Court. The case no is CC/87/2014 and the judgment uploaded on 29 Sep 2016.
::BEFORE THE DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM, AT BIDAR::
C.C.No. 87/2014
Date of filing : 13/11/2014
Date of disposal : 28/09/2016
P R E S E N T:- (1) Shri. Jagannath Prasad Udgata,
B.A., LL.B.,
President.
(2) Shri. Shankrappa,(Halilpurgi)
B.A.LL.B.,
Member.
COMPLAINANT: Shaik Abdul Khaleeq,
Age: 45 years, Occ:Self employment,
R/o Noor Khan Talee, Bidar.
(By Shri. K.H.Patil, Advocate)
VERSUS
OPPONENT/S :- 1. Shriram General Insurance Co.Ltd.,
E-8, EPIP, RIICO, Sitapur Jaipur-302022.
(Rajastan).
2. Shriram Transport Finance Co.Ltd.,
Tripurant Road, Basavakalyan,
Dist. Bidar.
(O.P.No.1 by Shri.Prakash.V.M., Advocate)
( O.P.No.2 by Shri. Rajesh G., Advocate)
:: J UD G M E N T : :
By Shri. Jagannath Prasad Udgata, President.
The complainant is before us U/s. 12 of the C.P.Act., 1986, filed against the O.Ps claiming reimbursement of a sum of Rs.2,23,900/- for damage to his vehicle.
2. The gist of the case is as here under:
That he was an owner of lorry (Ashok Leyland) bg.no. KA-39-2499 which was plying for a livelihood. The lorry was under insurance coverage issued by the O.P.no.1 vide policy no.10010/31/14/007876, the ownership of lorry in question was aquired by the complainant on 19-10-2013. Fitness certificate of the lorry was valid up to 10-10-2014.
3. While the matter stood us such the lorry met with an accident on 23-10-2013 at Margutti cross of Gulbarga-Humnabad high way and he had to spend a sum of Rs. 2,23,900/- for repair of the vehicle. After getting the vehicle repaired when he approached the O.P.no.1 Insurance company they did not come forward to reimburse the repair charges and hence, after serving a legal notice (Ex.P.1) on 20-08-2014 he is before us seeking damages and compensation. On the receipt of the Court notices both the O.Ps have put up appearance in the case and the Insurance company has vehemently denied the insurable claims of the complainant. It is further stated by the Insurance Company that, the estimates of the complainant is highly inflated and hence not due, more so when the complainant/transferee has failed and neglected to inform the Insurance Company regarding transfer as prescribed U/s. 157(2) of the Motor Vehicle Act. The complainant all together submitted ten documents listed at the end of the order and both sides have filed their respective evidence affidavits and also written arguments.
4. In support of his claim the complainant has submitted before us the Judgment rendered by the Hon’ble National Commission reported in I (2009) CPJ 183 (NC) Oriental Insurance Co.LTd. V/s Om Prakash Gupta & anr. The ratio of which reproduce here under:
Insurance- Insurable interest- Contention, vehicle transferred to transferee- Insurance policy not transferred- No insurable interest created in favour of complainant-Contention not acceptable-As per GR-10 issued by Traffic Advisory Committee on sale of vehicle benefits under policy, on date of transfer automatically accrue to new owner- Vehicle already transferred in name of complainant in RTO record- Complainant entitled to benefits accruing from policy-Insurer held liable to pay value of vehicle with interest- No interference required revision. |
5. Per contra in support of their defence the O.Ps have relied upon two Judgments by the Hon’ble National Commission in R.P.No.3597/2008 date of disposal 16-01-2014 ( New India Assurance Co.Ltd. V/s Akbar and also another order of the National Commission in R.P.no. 3216/2015 date of disposal 16-08-2016. Future General India Insrance Co. V/s Sombir). From the documents submitted by the complainant in this case we observe a letter dated 20-12-2013 (Ex.P.6) sent by Shriram General Insurance Co. to M/s Shriram Transport Finance Co.Ltd. in which, it has been claimed that as on the date of accident the insured M/s Shriram Transport Finance Co.Ltd. as appears in Ex.P.7 was no more having insured interest on the vehicle under reference, having been sold to the complainant much earlier to the date of accident.
6. The entire origin and genesis of the case now veers around the correct interpretation of section 157(2) of the Motor Vehicle Act. in which a responsibility has been casted upon the transferee to intimate the fact of the transfer to the insurer within a period of 14 days. While interpreting the provisions of section 157 IMV Act., even though the Hon’ble National Commission has on lthe year 2009 construed a liberal view in favour of the insured, in the two recent Judgments quoted by the O.P.no.1 the National Commission had completely ignored any benevolent construction in favour of the transferee contravening section 157(2) of the vehicle act. The later two cases having been of recent origin compels us to answer the claims of the complainant in negative since in Ex.P.7 the name of M/s Shriram Transport Finance Co. Ltd. has been appearing as the insured and the present complaint would be precluded to claim anything from the insurer O.P.no.1. Accordingly, we proceed to pass the following:
: : ORDER : :
The complaint filed by the complainant is dismissed as not maintainable. There would be no order as to costs.
( Typed to our dictation then corrected, signed by us and then pronounced in the open Forum on this 28th day of September-2016 )
Sd/- Sd/-
Sri. Shankrappa H. Sri. Jagannath Prasad
Member. President.
Documents filed by the complainant.
Sd/- Sd/-
Sri. Shankrappa H. Sri. Jagannath Prasad
Member. President.
DOCUMENTS RELIED UPON BY THE PARTIES (COPIES)
1. | Ex.P.1 | Certificate of Registration of the vehicle KA-32 A 4563 |
2. | Ex.P.2 | Death Certificate of Peer Pasha. |
3. | Ex.P.3 | Office Copy of Legal Notice dated: 01-03-2013. |
4. | Ex.P.4 | Four Postal receipts. |
5. | Ex.P.5 | Postal acknowledgment forms (three number & combined) |
6. | Ex.P.6 | Money receipt dated: 10-04-2012. |
7. | Ex.P.7 | Money receipt dated: 28-09-2011 |
8. | Ex.P.8 | Money receipt dated: 27-09-2011 |
9. | Ex.P.9 | Money receipt dated: 04-08-2011 |
10. | Ex.P.10 | Money receipt dated: 12-07-2011 |
11. | Ex.P.11 | Money receipt dated: 10-06-2011 Totally remitted by |
12. | Ex.P.12 | Money receipt dated: 12-04-2011 late Syed Peer Pasha |
13. | Ex.P.13 | Money receipt dated: 18-03-2011 Rs. 4,78,100/- |
14. | Ex.P.14 | Money receipt dated: 07-01-2011 |
15. | Ex.P.15 | Money receipt dated: 13-12-2010 |
16. | Ex.P.16 | Money receipt dated: 03-07-2010 |
17. | Ex.P.17 | Money receipt dated: 06-05-2010 |
18. | Ex.P.18 | Cheque of AXIS BANK (Drawee not mentioned) |
19. | Ex.P.19 | Representation to Asst. R.T.O. Basavakalyana dated: 07-06-2013 |
20. | Ex.P.20 | Notice of the A.R.T.O. to Syed Peer Pasha (Loanee) dated: 29-05-2013 (much after death).
|
21. | Ex.P.21 | Application of Shriram Transport Finance Co.Ltd., to A.R.T.O. Basavakalyana dated: 27-05-2013 (Death of Peer Pasha not mentioned)
|
OPPOSITE PARTIES | ||
1. | Ex.R.1 | Loan cum Hypothecation agreement dated: 23-10-2010 with appendixes (Spl. noting at Schedule III) |
2. | Ex.R.2 | Loan cum Hypothecation agreement of restructured loan dated: 27-10-2012 (Spl. Noting at Schedule III) of the document. |
3. | Ex.R.3 | Certificate of Insurance dated: 31-03-2010. |
4. | Ex.R.4 | R.C. Book of vehicle No. KA 32 A 4563. |
5. | Ex.R.5 | Insurance Certificate for the above said vehicle. |
6. | Ex.R.6 | National permit of the above said vehicle. |
7. | Ex.R.7 | Authorisation certificate of N.P. (Goods) issued by Secretary, R.T.A. Government of Karnataka. |
8. | Ex.R.8 | Summary of loans for vehicle No. KA 32 A 4563. |
9. | Ex.R.9 | Details of agreement dated: 23-11-2013 by Shriram Finance. |
10. | Ex.R.10 | Certificate of Insurance issued by OP No.3 |
11. | Ex.R.11 | Instrument of G.P.A. |
Sd/- Sd/-
Sri. Shankrappa H. Sri. Jagannath Prasad
Member. President.
Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes
Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.