| DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, BALASORE | | AT- KATCHERY HATA, NEAR COLLECTORATE, P.O, DIST- BALASORE-756001 |
|
| |
| Complaint Case No. CC/50/2016 | | ( Date of Filing : 16 Apr 2016 ) |
| | | | 1. Harendra Narayan Das, aged about 62 years | | S/o. Late Laxmidhar Das, At- Padabadagan, P.O- Haldipada, P.S- Sadar, Dist- Balasore. | | Odisha |
| ...........Complainant(s) | |
| Versus | | 1. Sri Tapan Behera, Executive Engineer, NESCO, Section- Rupsa | | Sub-Division RE-1, Dist- Balasore. | | Odisha | | 2. Debendra Nath Behera, S.D.O (Deputy Manager, Electrical), NESCO, Section- Rupsa | | Sub-Division RE-1, Dist- Balasore. | | Odisha | | 3. R.G Kar (A.V.O), NESCO, Section- Rupsa | | Sub-Division RE-1, Dist- Balasore. | | Odisha | | 4. G.G Mohanty, J.E (NESCO), Rupsa Section | | Sub-Division RE-1, Dist- Balasore. | | Odisha | | 5. C.E.O-cum-M.D, NESCO, NESCO Corporate Office, Balasore | | Near Remuna Golei, Januganj, Dist- Balasore. | | Odisha |
| ............Opp.Party(s) |
|
|
| |
| BEFORE: | | | | HON'BLE MR. NILAKANTHA PANDA PRESIDENT | | | HON'BLE MR. JIBAN KRUSHNA BEHERA MEMBER | |
| |
| PRESENT: | | | Sri Bikash Mohan Das, Advocate for the Opp. Party 0 | | | Sri Bikash Mohan Das, Advocate for the Opp. Party 0 | | | Sri Bikash Mohan Das, Advocate for the Opp. Party 0 | |
| Dated : 26 Jun 2023 |
| Final Order / Judgement | The case record is posted today for hearing of the case. Neither the complainant nor his Advocate is present nor taken any step. Advocate for the O.Ps No.1, 2 & 4 is present and files hazira and O.P No.5 is absent. On repeated calls, none respond on behalf of the complainant and O.P No.5. Hence, hearing of the case could not be taken up. In the present case, O.Ps No.1, 2 & 4 were appeared and filed written versions, whereas the case against O.P No.3 was dismissed and O.P No.5 was set ex parte. As it appears from the case record, the complainant did not turn up and slept over the matter since 28.05.2019 and no step is taken nor did his advocate take any step on his behalf, for which hearing of the case impaired and further the valuable time of this Commission is being wasted. Considering the above facts and circumstances of the case and the nature and conduct of the complainant, this Commission is of the view that the complaint of the complainant should be dismissed. Accordingly, the complaint of the complainant is dismissed for non-prosecution of the case. The interim order, if any, passed earlier against the Ops shall remain infructuous. | |
| |
| | | [HON'BLE MR. NILAKANTHA PANDA] | PRESIDENT
| | | | | | [HON'BLE MR. JIBAN KRUSHNA BEHERA] | MEMBER
| | | |
