West Bengal

Kolkata-III(South)

CC/159/2018

Smt. Bharati Rani Das. - Complainant(s)

Versus

Sri Pradip Kumar Das. - Opp.Party(s)

11 Oct 2018

ORDER

CONSUMER DISPUTE REDRESSAL FORUM
KOLKATA UNIT-III(South),West Bengal
18, Judges Court Road, Kolkata 700027
 
Complaint Case No. CC/159/2018
( Date of Filing : 27 Mar 2018 )
 
1. Smt. Bharati Rani Das.
W/O Sri Bidhu Bhusan Dalai both Residing at 45/C, Bikramgarh Colony, P.S. Jadavpur, Kolkata-700032.
...........Complainant(s)
Versus
1. Sri Pradip Kumar Das.
S/O Sri Narayan Ch. Das residing at 209, Bikramgarh, P.S. Jadavpur Kolkata-700032 also known as 82/39,P.G.H. Shah Road, P.S. Jadavpur, Kolkata-700032, Presently residing at C/7,2 no. Podar Nagar, P.S. Jadavpur, Kolkata-700032.
2. Smt. Sona Das
W/o Sri Pradip Kumar Das, 209, Bikramgarh, P.S. Jadavpur Kolkata-32, 82/39,P.G.H. Shah Road, P.S. Jadavpur, Kolkata-700032,Presently at C/7,2 no. Podar Nagar, P.S. Jadavpur, Kolkata-700032.
............Opp.Party(s)
 
BEFORE: 
 HON'BLE MRS. Sashi Kala Basu PRESIDENT
 HON'BLE MRS. Balaka Chatterjee MEMBER
 HON'BLE MR. Ayan Sinha MEMBER
 
For the Complainant:
For the Opp. Party:
Dated : 11 Oct 2018
Final Order / Judgement

Dt. of filing- 27/03/2018

Dt. of Judgement- 11/10/2018

Mrs. Sashi Kala Basu,President.

        This is a complaint  filed u/s. 12 of the Consumer Protection Act, 1986 by the complainants namely  Smt. Bharati Rani Dalal and Sri Debabrata Dalal  alleging deficiency in service on the part of  Opposite Parties namely Sri Pradip Kumar Das and Smt. Mona Das.

          Brief facts of the case of the complainants is that Opposite Parties being the joint owners of the land measuring about  2 cottah 85 chittaks situated at  Municipal  Premises No. 28/39, Prince Golam  Hossain Shah Road locally known as Premises no. 209, Bikramgarh, P. S. – Jadavpur, Kolkata – 700 032 under K.M.C.  Ward No.93 decided to develop the land  of the  said Premises by constructing a multi-storied  building  after obtaining sanction of  building plan from  KMC. Complainants  being intending  purchasers entered into an agreement  of sale with the Opposite Parties  in the month of November 2016 in respect of a self-contained flat being entire first floor ( South East ) measuring  415 sq.ft.  of super built up area  ( including  20% common area ) at  a consideration price of  Rs.11,41,250/- only  i.e. Rs.  2750/- per sq.ft.  An amount of Rs. 4,00,000/-  only  was paid by the complainant  as earnest money by cheque bearing no.477496 dated 29.11.2016 and thereafter complainant has  paid further  amount of Rs. 3,00,000/- on four different  dates i.e.  on 01.03.2017, 15.07.2017, 07.08.2017 and on  27.08.2017 respectively. As per agreement, flat was to be  handed over to the  complainants within  14 months   from the date  of execution of agreement for sale i.e. within January 2018 . But  the Opposite Parties have failed and neglected to comply the said  terms of the agreement. Hence,   a notice  dated 02.10.2017 and 02.02.2018 was  sent by the  complainants  to the Opposite Parties but Opposite Parties failed to deliver the possession of the flat. Hence this complaint is filed by  the complainants praying for directing  the Opposite Parties either to deliver possession of the flat to the complainants by executing and registering the deed of conveyance in  respect of the said flat upon receipt of  balance consideration amount or to  refund the part payment made by the complainants  of Rs. 7,00,000/- along with compensation of Rs. 5,00,000/- and litigation cost of Rs. 50,000/-.

          Complainants have  annexed with the complaint, photo copy of gift deed, K.M.C. tax receipts in the name of   Opposite Parties, Agreement for Sale entered between the parties, receipts showing payment and copy  of notice  dated 02.10.2017 and lawyer’s notice dated 02.02.2018.

          On perusal  of the record, it appears that the Opposite Parties appeared  through their  Ld. Advocate on 03.05.2018 and prayed for time for filing written version but vide order dated 29.06.2018, case was fixed for exparte hearing as Opposite Parties did not take any  step. Neither any written version  was filed by them.

          During   the course of evidence, complainants filed the petition stating to treat the petition  of complaint as affidavit –in-chief. Thereafter argument  has been heard on behalf of the complainants.

          So the points require determination  is :-

  1. Whether   there has been any deficiency in service on the part of the Opposite Parties ?
  2. Whether the complainants are entitled to the reliefs as prayed for ?

Decision  with reasons

          Point No. 1 :

          Both these points  are taken up together  for discussions in order to avoid  repeatations.

          According to the complainants,  apposite Parties are the owners of the  land where the proposed building was  being constructed and in support  of the said contention, copy of the  gift deed in the name of Opposite Parties has been filed. The agreement of sale filed by the complainants  reveal   that the parties in this case entered into an agreement for sale in November 2016 in respect of flat mentioned in the schedule of the complaint petition  measuring  415 sq.ft.  at a total consideration  price of Rs. 11,41,250/- only. The agreement indicates that   earnest  money of Rs. 4,00,000/-  was paid by the  complainants by way of  an Account Payee  Cheque  towards the purchase of the  flat. The receipts filed further show that Rs.1,50,000/- on 01.03.2017 , Rs.20,000/- on 15.07.2017,  Rs.1,15,000/- on 07.08.2017 and RS. 15,000/- was paid by the complainants  on  27.08.2017 respectively to the Opposite Parties. So total sum of Rs. 7,00,000/- has been paid. It further appears that  as per agreement, possession of the  flat was to be delivered by the Opposite Parties within 14 months of execution of agreement  of sale. But  it is  stated by the complainants that  inspite of sending notices,  Opposite Parties have failed to  deliver the possession of the flat in question. According to the complainants that the flat is not even  completely  constructed. It transpires  from the notice dated 02.02.2018, it is stated therein by the complainants  that  if the  Opposite Parties  were unable to  deliver possession of the said flat  in favour of the complainants upon accepting the balance  amount of  consideration   than the Opposite Parties  were  at liberty to refund the amount of Rs. 7,00,000/- paid by the complainants  towards part payment together with interest therein  and the damages of Rs. 1,50,000/-. But the  Opposite Parties neither delivered  the possession nor refunded the money. So it is apparent that there is deficiency in service on the part of the Opposite Parties. In such a situation,  complainants are  entitled  to an order of directing the Opposite Parties  to deliver the possession of flat by executing  and registering the deed of  conveyance  upon   receipt of  balance amount of consideration  or in alternate to refund the amount  paid by the complainants  as part payment together with  interest thereon till its realization. They are  also entitled to the compensation  of  Rs. 1,00,000/- for harassment and mental agony and  litigation  cost of Rs. 10,000/- as they have been compelled to file this  case.These pints are thus answered accordingly.

Hence,

ORDERED

CC/159/2018 is allowed ex-parte against the Opposite Parties. Opposite Parties are directed to deliver the possession of  the flat mentioned in the schedule of the petition of complaint by executing and registering the deed of conveyance on receiving the balance amount of consideration from the complainant,  within three months from the date of this order or in alternate  they are directed to refund the amount paid by the complainants of Rs.7,00,000/- as part payment together with interest  thereon @ 8% p.a. from 01.03.2017 ( the date of making payment by the complainants lastly ) till  its  realisation. The Opposite Parties are further directed to pay Rs. 1,00,000/-  as compensation and  Rs.10,000/- as litigation cost to the complainants within the aforementioned period of three months.                  

 
 
[HON'BLE MRS. Sashi Kala Basu]
PRESIDENT
 
[HON'BLE MRS. Balaka Chatterjee]
MEMBER
 
[HON'BLE MR. Ayan Sinha]
MEMBER

Consumer Court Lawyer

Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!

Experties

Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes

Phone Number

7982270319

Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.