Heard Mr. S. Sarma, learned counsel, appearing for the applicant. None appeared for the respondent despites showing the name of the counsel appearing for the respondent in the cause list. However, respondent has filed their objection against the application for condonation of delay.

                 This is an application for condoning the delay of 551 days in preferring the accompanying appeal. We have perused the statements made in the application. Also perused the objection filed on behalf of the respondent. The grounds for delay has been explained at paragraphs 3, 4 and 5 of the application. We have found that sufficient causes have been shown for not preferring the appeal in time. Thus, considering the statements made in the application, particularly, statements made on oath at paragraphs 3, 4 and 5 of the application, also for the ends of justice, delay in preferring the accompanying appeal is condoned.

                 Misc Case is allowed and disposed of accordingly.