Learned counsel for Petitioner is present.
2. Heard.
3. The matter has been listed for hearing by inadvertent mistake of the office.
4. The copy of the impugned order is filed today by the learned counsel for the petitioner.
5. He submitted that matter may be heard today for admission.
6. Heard the matter for admission.
7. Mr. Nanda, learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that learned District Commission, without hearing the OP has passed the impugned order by directing to release the vehicle for payment of Rs.2,05,000/- by the complainant to the OP. According to him the amount due is Rs.6,86,336/- and the complainant has produced the incorrect material before the learned District Commission to obtain the ex-parte interim order set-aside. So, he submitted to set-aside the impugned order by allowing the revision.
8. Considered the submission of the learned counsel for the petitioner. Perused the impugned order. The interim order shows that this order was ex-parte passed U/S-13(3-B) of the Consumer Protection Act,1986. The interim order shows that learned District Commission has directed the OP to receive 50% of five EMI and release the vehicle bearing No OD-14R-7478 The present petitioner was asked by the learned District Commission to file written version and objection to the Misc.Case filed before it.
9. There is nothing to interfere with the impugned order because it has already been passed after going through the material produced by the complainant. However, the present petitioner is directed to appear before the learned District Commission and file objection. Learned District Commission would hear both the parties on the interim petition and pass afresh order within 30 days from the date of receipt of this order. Till then the interim order is stayed.
10. The revision petition is disposed of accordingly.
Free copy of the order be supplied to the learned counsel for the petitioner who appear before the learned District Forum on 10.05.2021 and take further instruction.
