NCDRC

NCDRC

RP/2335/2006

REGIONAL PROVIDENT FUND COMMISSIONER - Complainant(s)

Versus

SMT. RAMANI BALA SATHIK - Opp.Party(s)

M/S. MANCHANDA AND CO.

27 Aug 2010

ORDER


NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHIREVISION PETITION NO. 2335 OF 2006
(Against the Order dated 15/12/2005 in Appeal No. 442/2003 of the State Commission West Bengal)
1. REGIONAL PROVIDENT FUND COMMISSIONERDK, BLOCK , SECTOR -11 . SALT LAKE CITY, KOLKATA - 700091 ...........Petitioner(s)
Versus
1. SMT. RAMANI BALA SATHIK34/36. NASKARPARA LANE , P.O.B. GARDEN , P,S SHIBPUR , DIST- HOWRAH -3 - ...........Respondent(s)

BEFORE:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK BHAN ,PRESIDENTHON'BLE MRS. VINEETA RAI ,MEMBER
For the Petitioner :Mr.Rajesh Manchanda, Advocate for M/S. MANCHANDA AND CO., Advocate
For the Respondent :NEMO

Dated : 27 Aug 2010
ORDER

Consumer Court Lawyer

Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!

Experties

Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes

Phone Number

7982270319

Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.

            Counsel for the petitioner has moved this application seeking dismissal of the Revision Petition as having abated because there are no legal representatives of the deceased respondent.

            Misc. Application is allowed.  Revision Petition is dismissed as abated.

 



......................JASHOK BHANPRESIDENT
......................VINEETA RAIMEMBER