Counsel for the petitioners present.   None for the respondent despite service.  There is allegation of unauthorized use of the electricity. Notice U/section 126 was given.

In view of the Hon’ble Supreme Court’s authority reported in the case of “U.P. Power Corporation Ltd. & Ors. Vs. Anis Ahmad”, [(2013) 8 Supreme Court Cases 491], this Commission has no jurisdiction to try this case.

Consequently, we accept the Revision Petition, set aside the orders passed by the Fora below and dismiss the complaint.  However, liberty is granted to the complainant to approach the appropriate Forum, for redressal of his grievances, as per Law.  So far as the limitation is concerned, he can seek help from Laxmi Engineering Works Vs. P.S.G. Industrial Institute [(1995) 3 Supreme Court Cases 583].