Haryana

Karnal

CC/181/2022

Sunil Kumar - Complainant(s)

Versus

Shubham Housing Development Finance Company Limited - Opp.Party(s)

Ravinder Pundir

13 Dec 2024

ORDER

BEFORE THE DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, KARNAL.

 

                                                          Complaint No.181 of 2022

                                                          Date of instt.31.03.2022

                                                          Date of Decision: 13.12.2024

 

Sunil Kumar son of Shri Rampal Sharma, resident of H.No.159, Ward No.13,Chhoti Chopal, Village Arainpura, Tehsil Gharaunda, District Karnal aged 39 years.

…….Complainant

                                        Versus

1.     Shubham Housing Development Finance Company Ltd. SCO 29, IInd Floor, Mugal Canal, Near Nanital Bank, Karnal, through its Manager.

2.     Shubham Housing Development Finance Company Limited, Regd. Office at Plot No.425, Udyog Vihar, Phase-4, Gurgaon 122015, Haryana, through its authorized signatory.                                                                                                                                                                                          …..Opposite parties.

Complaint under Section 35 of Consumer Protection Act, 2019.

 

Before      Sh. Jaswant Singh………President. 

                Mrs.Neeru Agarwal……….Member

                Mrs. Sarvjeet Kaur……..Member.

 

Present:  Complainant in person represented by

Shri Ravinder Pundir, Advocate.

                Shri Dheeraj SAchdeva, counsel for the OPs.

                  

                Today the case is fixed for compromise before Pre National Lok Adalat. Compromise not effected.

                Complainant alongwith his counsel has suffered his separate statement to the effect that he has paid an amount of Rs.1,50,000/- under pressure of the OP and OP had issued NOC. The loan amount has been disbursed in his account on 18.06.2021 but OP has started to deduct the installments of loan from 05.11.2020. Hence, he withdraws the present complaint and reserve his right to file fresh complaint against the OP qua the excess interest charged by the OP and on account of harassment suffered by him. The time period consumed during the pendency of the present complaint may kindly be exempted.   

                   In view of the above statement, the present complaint is hereby dismissed as withdrawn. However, the complainant is at liberty to file fresh complaint with regard to his grievances, if so desired. In view of the law laid down Hon’ble Supreme Court in Laxmi Engineering Works Vs PSG Industries Institute (1995) 3 SCC 583, the complainant will be entitled to get the benefit of provisions of Section 14 of the Limitation Act, to exclude the period spent in prosecuting the present complaint, while computing the period of limitation prescribed for filing such before the competent Court of Law. The parties concerned be communicated of the order accordingly and file be consigned to the record room after due compliance.

Announced:

Dated: 13.12.2024.           

                       President, 

District Consumer Disputes

Redressal Commission, Karnal.

 

(Neeru Agarwal)                (Sarvjeet Kaur) 

  Member                                Member