Per Shri Dhanraj Khamatkar, Hon’ble Member: (1) When the matter is called out none is present, hence, the case is taken up for orders on merit. (2) This appeal takes an exception to an order passed by the District Consumer Disputes Redressal Forum, Solapur, on 22/07/2010 in Consumer Complaint No.278/2009. (3) The facts of the case in brief can be summarized as under: That the original Complainant/Appellant had taken a loan of Rs.3,50,000/- from the Opposite Party/Respondent Finance Company for purchasing a vehicle No.MH-04-AL-8637. The original Complainant/Appellant herein had paid an amount of Rs.75,000/- as deposit and she got possession of the vehicle on 11.07.2007. It is an allegation of the original Complainant/Appellant that she had not received R.C. Book of the vehicle from the Opposite Party and she could not take the vehicle on road. Despite request of the original Complainant/Appellant, Respondent Finance Company had not handed over the papers. Hence, she had filed consumer complaint praying for compensation of Rs.2,50,00/- from the Opposite Party Finance Company, Rs.25,000/- as compensation for mental agony and the papers of the vehicle. (3) We have perused the papers and evidence on record. (4) The Finance Company had taken possession of the vehicle on 15/06/2007 as the Complainant could not pay the monthly installments of the loan taken from the Opposite Party finance Company. In a complaint she had alleged that she was given possession of the vehicle on 10.07.2007. On the contrary the Finance Company has taken possession of the vehicle on 15.06.2007. Original Complainant/Appellant has not produced any evidence to show that she was regular in making the payment of the installments. The Forum below has after considering all the evidence has passed the order and we do not find anything wrong in the order passed by the forum below. (5) In view of the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case, we pass the following order: O R D E R (i) Appeal is dismissed in limine. (ii) No order as to costs. | 
