West Bengal

Kolkata-III(South)

CC/444/2017

Jainendra Kumar Sharma. - Complainant(s)

Versus

Shribhumi Realty Pvt. Ltd. - Opp.Party(s)

N. Banerjee

11 Nov 2019

ORDER

CONSUMER DISPUTE REDRESSAL FORUM
KOLKATA UNIT-III(South),West Bengal
18, Judges Court Road, Kolkata 700027
 
Complaint Case No. CC/444/2017
( Date of Filing : 01 Aug 2017 )
 
1. Jainendra Kumar Sharma.
S/O Umesh Prasad Sharma Tea Garden, shiv Mandir Lane, Namkom Bazar, Ranchi
...........Complainant(s)
Versus
1. Shribhumi Realty Pvt. Ltd.
having its registered office at 50, A.J.C. Bose rd, Thakurpukur, P.S. Thakurpukur, Kol-63 And Corporate office At 127C/6, James Long Sarani, Kol-700008.
2. Mr. Gopal Malakar
Director of Shribhumi Realty Pvt. Ltd. residing at 300 Parnasree Pally, Aratrika Apartment, 1st Floor, Behala, Kol-700060.
3. Mr. Soumitra Roy
Director of Shribhumi Realty Pvt. Ltd. residing at Saryen Park, Joka-2, Thakurpukur,Kolkata,Pin-700104.
4. Mr. Biswabrata Maity
Director of Shribhumi Realty Pvt. Ltd. residing at Manik Bandopadhyay Sarani, Bally, Dist.- Howrah, Pin- 711227.
5. Mr. Sagar Ganguly
Former Director of Shribhumi Realty Pvt. Ltd. residing at 53/A, Dr. N. N. Bagchi Road, Barrackpore, Nona Chandan Pukur, Titagarh, Pin- 700120.
6. .
.
............Opp.Party(s)
 
BEFORE: 
 HON'BLE MRS. Sashi Kala Basu PRESIDENT
 HON'BLE MRS. Balaka Chatterjee MEMBER
 HON'BLE MR. Ayan Sinha MEMBER
 
For the Complainant:
For the Opp. Party:
Dated : 11 Nov 2019
Final Order / Judgement

Date of filing : 1.8.2017

Judgment : Dt.11.11.2019

Mrs. Sashi Kala Basu, Hon’ble President

            This petition of complaint is filed under section 12 of C.P.Act, 1986 by Jainendra Kumar Sharma alleging deficiency in service on the part of the opposite parties (referred as OP hereinafter) namely (1) Shribhumi Realty Pvt. Ltd., (2) Gopal Malakar, (3) Mr. Soumitra Roy, (4) Mr. Biswabrata Maity, (5) Mr. Sagar Ganguly and (6) Mr. Samit Dutta (name of OP No.6 striked out by the order of Hon’ble State Commission).

            Case of the Complainant, in short, is that the OP No.1 is a real estate company which performs buying, selling and renting and operating of self-owned or leased real estate. OP No.2 to 5 are the Directors of the OP No.1 and have utilized the funds of company at different point of time, to their benefits. On seeing the wide publication through internet advertisement, Complainant got in touch with a representative of the OP No.1 for purchasing one flat under MIG Category in the project (Shribhumi) and booked the same on payment of a sum of Rs.2,50,000/- by way of cheque, in favour of the Shribhumi Realty Pvt. Ltd. on payment of Rs.2,50,000/-, towards confirmation, two money receipts were issued by the OP No.1. It was assured that the said flat would be completed and handed over in the beginning of the year 2016 and further assured that after obtaining the sanctioned plan from the concerned authority, Complainant would be called upon to execute an agreement for sale in respect of the said flat. But, till date the project has not been completed and the project site is completely vacant. So, finding no progress, the Complainant by a representation dt.12.12.2016 through his Ld. Advocate, addressed to the OP No.1 asked for refund of the money along with interest. But, in spite of service of notice, OPs did not refund the amount to the Complainant. OPs have resorted to unfair trade practice. So, the present complaint has been filed praying to direct the OPs to jointly and severely return Rs.2,50,000/- towards booking amount paid to OP No.1 along with interest @ 10%, to pay compensation of Rs.1,00,000/- for causing mental harassment and agony and Rs.20,000/- towards litigation cost and other incidental charges.

            Complainant has filed two receipts showing payment of Rs.2,50,000/- by way of one cheque, and the copy of the notice sent through Ld. Advocate asking for the refund of booking amount of Rs.2,50,000/- along with interest .

            The case was being contested only by OP Samit Dutta but his name was striked out by the Hon’ble State Commission by its order dt.12.4.2019. Other OPs did not take any step, so the case proceeded ex-parte against them.

            So, the only point requires determination is : Whether the Complainant is entitled to the relief as prayed for?

Decision with reasons

            Admittedly, no agreement was executed by and between the parties. In order to substantiate his claim that he booked a flat under MIG Category in the said project of Shribhumi and has paid Rs.2,50,000/-, Complainant has filed two receipts issued by the OP No.1 dt.14.05.2014. The payment was made by the Complainant to purchase/book the flat by one cheque being No.003727 dt.10.05.2014. These receipts sufficiently establish that the Complainant had booked the flat. But the OPs have neither delivered him the said flat as agreed nor have refunded the amount of Rs.2,50,000/-. The claim of the Complainant is also established as there is absolutely no contrary material before this Forum to counter or rebut the claim of the Complainant.

            So, as the Complainant has neither been handed over the flat nor has been refunded the amount, in view of the discussions as highlighted above, OP No.1 to 5 are jointly and severely liable to pay the said booking amount of Rs.2,50,000/- along with interest in the form of compensation and also the litigation cost.

            Hence

                  ordered

            CC/444/2017 is allowed ex-parte against OP No.1 to 5. OP No.1 to 5 are jointly and severely directed to refund Rs.2,50,000/- to the Complainant and also to pay compensation in the form of interest @ 10% p.a. on the said sum from the date of payment to till this date, within two months from the date of this order. The OPs are further directed to pay litigation cost of Rs.12,000/- within the aforesaid period of two months, in default the entire sum shall carry interest @ 10%  till its realization.        

 
 
[HON'BLE MRS. Sashi Kala Basu]
PRESIDENT
 
 
[HON'BLE MRS. Balaka Chatterjee]
MEMBER
 
 
[HON'BLE MR. Ayan Sinha]
MEMBER
 

Consumer Court Lawyer

Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!

Experties

Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes

Phone Number

7982270319

Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.