(Passed On 8/12/2015)

            The revision petition  was initially taken up at 11.00 am for hearing. At that time none had appeared for the revision petitioner. Thereafter the revision petition was kept back till the end of the board. When the revision petition was taken up at the end of the board, none appeared for the revision petitioner and  respondent.

          Perusal of the record and proceeding of the revision petition shows that this Commission issued notice dated 23/10/2015 to the revision petitioner No. 1 by Registered Post A.D. on 30/10/2015. Acknowledgment about service of that notice to the revision petitioner No. 1 is received duly signed by it. No acknowledgment about service of notice to the revision petitioner No. 2 is received. However we presume that notice is also duly served to petitioner No. 2 since it is issued on its correct address given in the revision petition by Registered Post A.D. Both the revision petitioners failed to appear after service of notice. Therefore the revision petition is dismissed in default.