By this common order, we propose to dispose of the above noted three revision petitions arising out of the same impugned order involving the similar question of law and facts. 2. The petitioners in their respective revision petitions are aggrieved of the following orders passed by the State Commission as under:- eard both parties. Opposite parties 1 & 2/Respondents 2 & 3 in Appeal 383/12 and Respondents 3 & 4 in Appeal 279/12 are directed to replace the defective engine of the complainant car within one month from this day. Issue copy of this order to Opposite parties 1 and 2. 3. Learned counsels for the petitioners have drawn our attention to the order of the District Forum dated 29.12.2011 whereby the District Forum directed the petitioners to remove the defect of the complainant vehicle to his satisfaction providing a warranty of one year or 50000 kms for the engine and also pay Rs.25,000/- as compensation besides cost of litigation Rs.2,000/-. They have further contended that the State Commission, in violation of principle of natural justice, by the impugned order has modified the order of the District Forum and that too by a non-speaking without any reference to the grounds of appeal of the facts of the case. 4. Respondent no.1, the complainant has fairly conceded that the impugned order is a non-speaking order. Respondent has stated that he has no objection if the impugned order is set aside and matter is remanded back to the State Commission for disposal of appeals on merit. Respondent has further requested that in order to avoid any further delay, the disposal of appeals may be time bound. 5. In view of the above, we allow the revision petitions, set aside the impugned order and remand the matter back to the State Commission with request to the State Commission to dispose of the appeal within six months from the first date of appearance of the parties in the appeal. The revision petitions are disposed off accordingly. 6. Parties are directed to appear before the State Commission on 28.03.2014.