Heard counsel for the petitioner. There are concurrent findings of fora below. Both the fora below have held that the present petitioner had failed to prove that the telephone was disconnected at the request of the complainant. In the light of these findings, the present petitioner was directed to pay Rs.10,000/- as compensation and cost of Rs.2,000/-. In my opinion, the orders are not only well founded but also just, equitable and fair which cannot be interfered in exercise of revisional jurisdiction under Section 21(b) of Consumer Protection Act, 1986 as I do not find any illegality, material irregularity or jurisdictional error. The revision is accordingly dismissed with no order as to costs.