Despite three orders the petitioner/opposite party has not filed the originals of papers No.18 & 17 referred to in the orders of the fora below. Petitioner/opposite party is a financer. On 12.6.1989, the respondent/complainant deposited Rs.40,000/- with it carrying interest @ 18% p.a. FDR for this amount was issued. Respondent alleged that she had been paid only an amount of Rs.43,760/-. Attributing deficiency in service she filed complaint for payment of the balance principal and interest amount which was contested by the petitioner. On appreciation of evidence the District Forum directed the petitioner to pay amount of Rs.81,400/- to the respondent alongwith interest. Appeal taken out against forum’s order by the petitioner has been dismissed by the State Commission by the order dated 20.11.2009, under challenge. We have heard Sri Jain on admission. Orders passed by fora below are based on proper evaluation of the evidence which was before them. We do not find any illegality or jurisdictional error in the order of District Forum as affirmed by the State Commission warranting interference in revisional jurisdiction under Section 21(b) of the C.P. Act, 1986. Dismissed.