Jharkhand

StateCommission

FA/97/2012

Amit Singh - Complainant(s)

Versus

Santosh Kumar, H.N. Sons Industries - Opp.Party(s)

Mr. Chandrajit Mukherjee & A. Kumar

25 Jul 2016

ORDER

JHARKHAND STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION,RANCHI
FINAL ORDER
 
First Appeal No. FA/97/2012
(Arisen out of Order Dated 30/07/2010 in Case No. CC/231/2007 of District Ranchi)
 
1. Amit Singh
M/s Nirmal Enterprises, Liya Complex. 2nd Floor, Peepee Compound, P.O.-Doranda, P.S.- Chutia
Ranchi
...........Appellant(s)
Versus
1. Santosh Kumar, H.N. Sons Industries
Industrial Area , Tupudana, Hatia,m Ranchi-3
...........Respondent(s)
 
BEFORE: 
 HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.K. Merathia PRESIDENT
 HON'BLE MR. Ajit Kumar MEMBER
 HON'BLE MRS. Shabnam Perveen MEMBER
 
For the Appellant:
None
 
For the Respondent:
None
 
Dated : 25 Jul 2016
Final Order / Judgement

25-07-2016 - The reasons for delay in disposal of this appeal can be seen from the order sheet.                          

  1. Inspite of fixing this case for ex-parte hearing, nobody appears for the parties.
  1. A petition has been filed for condoning the delay of about 683 days in filing this appeal, but, no satisfactory grounds are made out at all for condoning the long delay of about 683 days.
  1. However, in the interest of justice, the delay is condoned, but subject to payment of cost of Rs. 2500/- to the respondent- complainant.
  1. After carefully going through the papers, we find that no grounds are made out for interfering with the findings of learned District Forum, that there was deficiency on the part of the O.P.2-appellant. He could not prove his defence that the warranty of mobile was not available as the warranty seal was found broken. Rather, the complainant proved that within the warrantee, he took the defective mobile to the appellant- (the authorized service centre) but for setting it right, charges were demanded.
  1. However, in our opinion, the amount of compensation and the rate of interest is on higher side.

In the circumstances, the operative portion of the impugned order is modified to the following extent. If not already done, the appellant is directed to repair the Mobile set of the complainant free of cost to his satisfaction and deliver it to him or, get the Set replaced with another Set of the same value i.e. Rs. 17,500/- or get Rs.17,500/- returned from the Company. The appellant will also pay Rs. 2,500/- as the cost of condoning the delay and Rs. 2,500/- as compensation, total Rs. 5000/- to the complainant. This order should be complied within 30 days of this order, failing which, the said amount of Rs. 17,500/- will also bear simple interest @ 9% P.A. from the date of this order, till the date of payment / realization.

This appeal, thus stands disposed off.

Issue free copy of this order to all concerned for information and needful.

Ranchi,

Dated:- 25-07-2016

 
 
[HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.K. Merathia]
PRESIDENT
 
[HON'BLE MR. Ajit Kumar]
MEMBER
 
[HON'BLE MRS. Shabnam Perveen]
MEMBER

Consumer Court Lawyer

Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!

Experties

Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes

Phone Number

7982270319

Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.