Haryana

StateCommission

RP/86/2017

RELIANCE RETAIL LIMITED - Complainant(s)

Versus

SANJEEV - Opp.Party(s)

LALIT SOOD

03 Nov 2017

ORDER

STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION HARYANA, PANCHKULA

 

                                                          Revision Petition No. 86 of 2017

Date of Institution:      20.09.2017

Date of Decision:       03.11.2017

 

1.      Reliance Retail Limited, HR-KTHL-JC-01, 77/10 and 78/10, Karnal Road, near Pehowa Chowk, Kaithal, through its Director.

 

2.      Reliance Corporate Parke, Building No.4, 5 TTC, Industrial Area, Thane Belapur Road, Ghausoli, Navi Mumbai-400701, through its Director.

 

…Petitioners-Opposite Parties No.2 and 3

 

Versus

 

Sanjeev son of Shri Ram Kala, resident of Gali No.6, Amargarh, Gamri, Kaithal.

 

…Respondent-Complainant

 

 

CORAM:   Hon’ble Mr. Justice Nawab Singh, President.

                   Shri Balbir Singh, Judicial Member.

                   Shri Diwan Singh Chauhan, Member.

                         

 

Present:     Shri Lalit Sood, counsel for the petitioners.

                    

                            

O R D E R

 

 NAWAB SINGH, J. (ORAL)

          Learned counsel for the petitioners has urged that this revision petition be dismissed as infructuous because the complaint titled ‘Sanjeev Versus Gurlove Telecom and others’ has already been decided by the District Consumer Disputes Redressal Forum, Kaithal on 28^th September, 2017.

2.      It is ordered accordingly.

         

Announced 03.11.2017

(Diwan Singh Chauhan) Member

(Balbir Singh) Judicial Member

(Nawab Singh) President

  D.R.