Haryana

Rohtak

CC/19/132

Hemant Dawra - Complainant(s)

Versus

Samsung India Electronics Pvt. Ltd. - Opp.Party(s)

Sh. Yatin Bhutani

06 Jul 2021

ORDER

District Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission Rohtak.
Haryana.
 
Complaint Case No. CC/19/132
( Date of Filing : 18 Mar 2019 )
 
1. Hemant Dawra
S/o Sh. Narender Dawra aged 41 Years R/o 59/3, Ward No.6 Partap Maholla Rohtak.
...........Complainant(s)
Versus
1. Samsung India Electronics Pvt. Ltd.
SCO 35 Sector-31, Gurgaon through its M.D.
2. Samsung Service Center
Shop No. 9 RJL Complex Nr. Bus Stand Jhajjar 124101 through its Incharge.
3. Deshmesh Mobile
Shop No. B-11,133 Gohana Road Rohtak.
............Opp.Party(s)
 
BEFORE: 
 HON'BLE MR. Nagender Singh Kadian PRESIDENT
  Mrs. Tripti Pannu MEMBER
 
PRESENT:
 
Dated : 06 Jul 2021
Final Order / Judgement

Before the District Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission, Rohtak.

 

                                                          Complaint No. : 132.

                                                          Instituted on     : 18.3.2019.

                                                          Decided on       :  6.7.2021.  

 

Hemant Dawra, aged 41 years son of Sh. Narender Dawra, resident of 59/3, ward no.6 Partap Maholla Rohtak.

                                                                   ………..Complainant.

                                      Vs.

 

  1. Samsung India Electronics Pvt. Ltd. SCO 35 Sector-31 Gurgaon, through its M.D.
  2. Samsung Service Center Shop no.9 RjL Complex Nr. Bus Stand Jhajjar 124101 through its Incharge.
  3. Deshmash Mobile Shop no.B-11, 133 Gohana Road, Rohtak.

……….Opposite parties.

 

Present:       Shri Yahn Bhutani, Advocate for the complainant.

                   Shri Kunal Juneja, Advocate for the opposite party no.1.

                   Opposite party no.2 given up.

                   Opposite party no.3 already exparte.

 

                   File taken up today on an application moved by ld. Counsel for the complainant. Ld. Counsel for the opposite party no.1 made a statement that their full and final settlement has been effected with the complainant for Rs.64,000 only(Rs.Sixty four thousand only) and they will make the payment within 60 days after depositing the handset to the company by the complainant, which is not damaged and liquefied.

                   Ld. counsel for the complainant made a statement that he agrees with the above statement and has no objection to decide the case accordingly.

          In view of the statements made above by both parties, present complaint is hereby disposed of with direction to the complainant to deposit the old handset with the Company and thereafter, opposite party no.1 is directed to pay the alleged amount of Rs.64,000/- only(Rs. Sixty four thousand only)  to the complainant within 60 days, failing which opposite party shall be liable pay interest @ 9% per annum from today i.e. 6.7.2021 till its realization. Parties shall be bound by their respective statements. Copy of this order be supplied to the parties free of cost.

                   File be consigned to the record after due compliance.

Dated : 6.7.2021

 

 

Member                                                                President

                                                                             DCDRC, Rohtak

 

 
 
[HON'BLE MR. Nagender Singh Kadian]
PRESIDENT
 
 
[ Mrs. Tripti Pannu]
MEMBER
 

Consumer Court Lawyer

Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!

Experties

Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes

Phone Number

7982270319

Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.