Haryana

Karnal

CC/662/2022

Lakshay Kukreja - Complainant(s)

Versus

Samsung India Electronics Private Limited - Opp.Party(s)

Naveen Khetarpal

04 Jul 2023

ORDER

BEFORE THE DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, KARNAL.

                                                         Complaint No.662 of 2022

                                                          Date of instt.21.11.2022

                                                          Date of Decision:04.07.2023

 

Lakshay Kukreja son of Sh. Narender Kukreja R/o house no.619 Sector-6, Urban Estate Karnal.

…….Complainant

                                        Versus

  1. Samsung India Electronics Pvt., Ltd., at 20th to 24th floor, two horizon center golf course road, DLF phase V, Sector-43, Gurugram.
  2. Sachdeva Enterprises (Authorized service center of Samsung India) at railway road adjoining DAV Women college railway road Karnal.

                                                                …..Opposite parties.

Complaint under Section 35 of Consumer Protection Act, 2019.

Before    Sh. Jaswant Singh………President. 

                Sh. Vineet Kaushik……… Member.

        Dr. Rekha Chaudhary……..Member.

 

Present:  Sh. Lakshya Kukreja, complainant in person.

                   Sh. Dheeraj Sachdeva, counsel for the OP-1.

                   OP-2 exparte vide order dated 31.01.2023.

 

                   File taken up today on the application moved by the both parties for permission to withdraw the present complaint.

                   At this stage, learned counsel for the OP-1 has suffered a separate statement that the OP-1 is ready to pay 80% of the invoice amount i.e., totaling to Rs.1,20,000/- within 45 days from the date of receipt of the order, subject to the deposit of old unit with the service centre.

                   On the other hand, complainant suffered his separate statement to the effect that the matter has been compromised with the OP-1. Old mobile is already with the service center vide job sheet dated 08.11.2022. As per the statement given by the counsel for the OP-1. He does not want to pursue with the present complaint further and withdraws the same being compromised.

       In view of the above statements, the present complaint is hereby dismissed as withdrawn being compromised. Both parties will bound their statement. Parties concerned be communicated of the order accordingly and file be consigned to the record room.

Announced
Dated:04.07.2022               

                          President,       

District Consumer Disputes

Redressal Commission, Karnal.

(Vineet Kaushik)   (Dr. Rekha Chaudhary) 

  Member                Member         

Consumer Court Lawyer

Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!

Experties

Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes

Phone Number

7982270319

Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.