Kerala

Ernakulam

CC/19/356

SHILU KAMAL - Complainant(s)

Versus

SALIM - Opp.Party(s)

22 May 2023

ORDER

BEFORE THE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM
ERNAKULAM
 
Complaint Case No. CC/19/356
( Date of Filing : 24 Sep 2019 )
 
1. SHILU KAMAL
CHARUVILAPUTHEN VEEDU, NADAYARA, VARKALA P O -695141, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM
...........Complainant(s)
Versus
1. SALIM
SMART N STYLE , CHITETHUKARA, CSEZ P.O, KOCHI-37
............Opp.Party(s)
 
BEFORE: 
 HON'BLE MR. D.B BINU PRESIDENT
 HON'BLE MR. RAMACHANDRAN .V MEMBER
 HON'BLE MRS. SREEVIDHIA T.N MEMBER
 
PRESENT:
 
Dated : 22 May 2023
Final Order / Judgement

 

DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION ERNAKULAM

       Dated this the 22nd day of May, 2023                                                                                                

                             Filed on: 24/09/2019

PRESENT

Shri.D.B.Binu                                                                          President

Shri.V.Ramachandran                                                              Member

Smt.Sreevidhia.T.N                                                                 Member                                                        

CC NO. 356/2019

Between

COMPLAINANTS

Shilu Kamal, Charuvilaputhen veedu, Nadayara, Varkala P.O., Thiruvananthapuram 695141.

VS

OPPOSITE PARTIES

1.      Salim, Smart “N” Style, Chittethukara, CSEZ P.O., Kochi 37

(Rep. by Adv. Muhammed Niyas K.H., Chamber No. 630, KHCAA Chamber Complex, Ernakulam 682031)

2.      Kibas, Hamrathi Tradings, 8/488, PSA Compound, Kulathara P.O., Kozhikode 673655

3.      Kibas, Mongooos Foot Care KSIDC Industrial Growth Centre, Foot Ware Park, Kinaloor P.O., Balussery, Kozhikode 673612

 

FINAL O R D E R

DB.Binu, President

 

Complainant absent, no representation. Today the case is posted for evidence of the complainant. Complainant has not turned up. The Commission has issued notice to the complainant twice. The notice issued to the complainant on 14/02/2023 is seen returned with an endorsement “Address left”. There is no scope in proceedings the case further since the complainant has not adduced evidence in this case. No proof affidavit filed by the complainant. 1st opposite party represented. Complainant is continuingly absent.

Hence the case is closed as ‘dismissed for default’.

Pronounced in the open Commission on this the 22nd day of May, 2023           

Sd/-  

D.B.Binu, President                          

                                                                             Sd/-

                                                          V.Ramachandran, Member

Sd/-

                                                         Sreevidhia T.N., Member

Forwarded/by Order

 

 

Assistant Registrar

 

Despatch date:

By hand:     By post                                                   

kp/

 

 

 

 

 

 

CC No. 967/2014

Order Date: 22/05/2023

 

 

                                                                                          

 

 

 

 

 
 
[HON'BLE MR. D.B BINU]
PRESIDENT
 
 
[HON'BLE MR. RAMACHANDRAN .V]
MEMBER
 
 
[HON'BLE MRS. SREEVIDHIA T.N]
MEMBER
 

Consumer Court Lawyer

Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!

Experties

Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes

Phone Number

7982270319

Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.