Rajasthan

StateCommission

CC/23/2020

Smt. Sushila Sharma W/o Shri Naryan Datt Sharma - Complainant(s)

Versus

Sahara Prime City Limited - Opp.Party(s)

Bupendra Pareek

01 Mar 2021

ORDER

BEFORE THE RAJASTHAN STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, JAIPUR

 

COMPLAINT CASE NO: 23/2020

 

Smt.Sushila Sharma w/o Sh.Narayan Dutt Sharma r/o House No. 114, Housing Board Colony, Mahendragarh Road, Narnol, Haryana & ors.

Vs.

Sahara City Homes, Marketing & Sales Corporation (Sahara Prime City Ltd. )through Regional Manager Opp. Radha Swami Satsang Vyas, Tonk Road, Jaipur & ors.

 

Date of Order 1.3.2021

 

Before:

Hon'ble Mr. Justice Banwari Lal Sharma-President

Hon'ble Mrs.Shobha Singh -Member

 

Mr.Bhupendra Pareek counsel for the complainant

Mr.Narendra Kumar Sharma counsel for the respondents

 

BY THE STATE COMMISSION ( PER HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE BANWARI LAL SHARMA, PRESIDENT ):

2

 

The present complaint is filed by the complainant Sushila Sharma & ors. against respondents Sahara City Homes stating therein that respondents published advertisement in daily newspapers regarding available flats/ independent raw house in township in Tonk Road with huge swimming pool, ideal environment, play ground, securty, communication service, appropriate transport facilities, modern education facilities, modern health care centre, Bharat Maa Naman Sthal, well planned infrastructure, Sahara City Homes Club, Community Centre, Home Plaza, Multiplex, Service Centre, Nature Care Centre and Energy savings etc. It was also told that after depositing 15% of the cost amount of the flat 85% of the cost amount of flat loan will also be available from banks, LIC Housing Finance, SBI. After impressing from the given advertisement complainant booked a flat in the aforesaid township on which Unit No. B-7/502 type 2 bedroom at fifth floor unit area 88.73 sq.mt. was allotted to the complainant on 21.8.2009 and the total cost was apprised as Rs.17,15,000/- and it was assured that from the date of allotment within 38 months the possession of the flat will be handed over to the complainant and in case of delay in payment the rate of interest will be charged as 15 % p.a.

3

 

Thereafter vide letter dated 15.2.2010 respondents increased the area of flat from 927.01 sq.ft. to 954.73 sq.ft. and cost of the house was also increased from Rs. 17,15,000/- to Rs.17,67,000/-. Accordingly the cost of house was increased arbitrarily and complainant was forced to make payment of the aforesaid amount also. The complainant paid all the amount i.e. Rs. 18,71,572/- to the respondents till 27.11.2012 according to schedule but respondents failed to construct the flat within stipulated period. Even after depositing the increased cost of house the possession of flat has not been given by the respondents to the complainant till date.

 

The total cost of the flat was told as Rs.17,67,000/- and as per the agreement the amount was deposited in the following manner:-

Receipt date

Receipt no.

FACode

TAG

Debit

Credit

31.12.2004

10135837658

600001

N

0

85750

16.07.2008

211408321966

600005

R

0

100000

28.07.2008

211408322801

600005

R

0

71500

15.07.2009

211409337099

600005

R

0

40493

11/08/09

211409342919

600005

R

0

30000

15.09.2009

211409351247

600005

R

0

30000

21.10.2009

211409359455

600005

R

0

22000

14.11.2009

211409366568

600005

R

0

8513

14.11.2009

211409366568

600012

T

0

487

14.11.2009

8211409366568

600012

T

487

0

14.11.2009

8211409366568

600005

J

0

487

12/12/09

211409374537

600005

R

0

20000

11/01/10

211410302220

600005

R

0

20000

15.02.2010

211410315252

600005

R

0

20000

15.03.2010

211410323967

600005

R

0

9868

15.03.2010

211410323967

600012

T

0

132

15.03.2010

8211410323967

600012

T

6

0

15.03.2010

8211410323967

600005

J

0

6

23.03.2010

8211410327040

600012

T

20

0

23.03.2010

8211410327040

600005

J

0

20

23.03.2010

211410327040

600012

T

0

157

23.03.2010

211410327040

600005

R

0

9843

19.05.2010

211410345548

600005

R

0

13493

19.05.2010

211410345548

600012

T

0

1507

12/07/10

211410361170

600005

R

0

20000

31.08.2010

211410377069

600005

R

0

20000

21.10.2010

211410389524

600005

R

0

20000

20.11.2010

211410397311

600005

R

0

20000

15.12.2010

211410405058

600005

R

0

20000

27.01.2011

211411304299

600005

R

0

20000

12/02/11

211411308650

600005

R

0

20000

28.02.2011

211411313794

600005

R

0

45000

01/03/11

211411314508

600005

R

0

20000

01/03/11

211411314265

600005

R

0

35000

14.03.2011

211411316383

600005

R

0

20000

15.03.2011

211411316536

600005

R

0

15000

13.04.2011

211411323640

600005

R

0

7022

13.04.2011

211411323640

600012

T

0

2978

23.07.2011

211411330012

600012

T

0

7500

12/09/11

211411332746

600012

T

0

9117

12/09/11

211411332746

600005

R

0

18883

13.09.2011

211411332773

600005

R

0

9825

13.09.2011

211411332773

600012

T

0

175

22.10.2011

211411334696

600022

T

0

5000

15.02.2012

211412301723

600005

R

0

73337

15.02.2012

211412301723

600012

T

0

26663

06/03/12

49000092994

600012

T

0

48060

06/03/12

49000092994

600005

R

0

530643

17.04.2012

49000093210

600012

T

0

1897

17.04.2012

49000093210

600005

R

0

82555

10/05/12

49000093267

600005

R

0

118122

10/05/12

211412304326

600012

T

0

510

10/05/12

49000093267

600012

T

0

724

15.06.2012

49000093420

600005

R

0

42940

15.06.2012

49000093420

600012

T

0

10

07/07/12

211412305894

600012

T

0

100

13.07.2012

49000093499

600012

T

0

1

13.07.2012

49000093499

600005

R

0

42225

11/08/12

49000093579

600005

R

0

42225

11/08/12

49000093579

600012

T

0

1

18.09.2012

49000093752

600005

R

0

42172

18.09.2012

49000093752

600012

T

0

54

27.11.2012

211412308021

600012

T

0

90

 

 

 

 

513

1872085

 

 

 

 

Net amount received

1871572

 

It is further averred that after depositing the aforesaid huge amount i.e. Rs. 18,71,572/- the respondents failed to perform its part of agreement without any reasonable cause which amounts deficiency in service of respondents and petitioner prayed for remitting Rs. 18,71,572/- with interest @ 18% p.a. from the date of depositing the amount.

 

Due to deficiency in service and negligence of respondents the complainant suffered mental, physical and economic discomfort, therefore, in this count he prayed for Rs.10 lakhs, Rs. 2 lakhs was claimed on account that petitioner has to took several rounds for claiming the amount and Rs. 1 lakh was claimed for advocate fee and other legal

6

 

expenses. Accordingly total Rs. 42,71,572/- has been claimed with interest.

 

In reply respondents admitted the receiving of aforesaid amount and it is mentioned that due to legal proceedings the property of respondent was attached by SEBI, therefore, respondents could not complete the project. However, they are ready to remit the amount.

 

Heard. Since there is no dispute of respondents regarding aforesaid payment which was depoited by complainant before the respondents, however,during course of arguments respondent's counsel proposed before this Commission that respondents are ready to return the principal amount with interest @ 9% p.a. from the date of receipt of each amount within three months. The learned counsel further states that respondents are also agree that if the amount has not been paid within three months then interest will be paid @ 12% p.a. from the date of receiving the each amount.

 

The learned counsel for the petitioner Mr.Bhupendra Pareek also submits that if respondents are ready to return the

7

 

amount with interest @ 9% p.a. within three months and if they failed to remit the amount within three months then interest @ 12% will be paid from the date of receiving the amount by the respondents then the complaint may be decided accordingly. However, the amount in term of mental and physical agony and legal expenses may also be awarded in favour of the complainant.

 

Since there is no dispute regarding receiving the amount by the respondents for the aforesaid flat and it is also not disputed that respondents failed to complete the project and deliver the possession of allotted flat to the complainant within stipulated period which is clear cut deficiency in service.

 

Therefore, it is ordered that respondents shall pay the amount which was deposited by the petitioner before them against booking and allotment of flat amounting to Rs. 18,71,572/- within three months from today with interest @ 9%p.a. From the date of receiving the each amount . It is made clear that if payment is not being paid within three months from today then the petitioner is entitled to get interest on the aforesaid amount @ 12% p.a. Instead of 9% p.a. Apart from it

8

 

the petitioner is also entitled for Rs. 2 lakhs for mental agony which he suffered due to deficiency in service of the respondents. He is also entitled for legal expenses including advocate's fee in the tune of Rs. 50,000/- from the respondents. It is also directed that the aforesaid amount of mental agony and legal expenses will also be paid within three months otherwise it will also carry interest @ 12% p.a. from today.

 

(Shobha Singh) (Banwari Lal Sharma)

Member President

 

nm

Consumer Court Lawyer

Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!

Experties

Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes

Phone Number

7982270319

Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.