Heard the learned counsel for the appellant.

          Perused the application for condonation of delay.  For the reasons stated in the application, delay of 44 days in filing the present appeal is condoned.

          As per the submission and perusal of file, the respondent No. 4, Dr. Rakesh Singh is a Neurologist and he performs as neurointervention also.   It is transpired that the Digital Subtraction Angiography (DSA) was supposed to be performed by respondent No. 4.  Dr. Sasidharan (OP-5), is an intensivist and is qualified to be an anaesthetist also.  Therefore, in my view, both the respondents, i.e., respondent No. 4 & 5 are necessary parties in this case.  Therefore, the State Commission shall take on record the respondent No. 4 & 5 as necessary parties and proceed further in the matter in accordance with law. 

          The first appeal is hereby allowed with above directions.

          Copy of this order be sent to State Commission.

          A copy of this order be given Dasti also.