Haryana

Yamunanagar

CC/434/2018

Mehar Chand S/o Ratti Ram - Complainant(s)

Versus

S.D.O. UHBVN Ltd. - Opp.Party(s)

Rajpal Kaushik

28 Mar 2019

ORDER

CC No.434 of 2018.

Mehar Chand vs. UHBVNL.

 

Present:            Complainant with Sh.Rajpal Kaushik, Adv.

 Sh.Raj Kumar UDC (Revenue) with Sh.Sushil Garg, Adv. for respondents.

                               

                  From the office of SDO respondent No.1 with Sh.Sushil Garg, Advocate Sh.Raj Kumar UDC ( R) suffered statement, according to which the complainant adjusted an amount of Rs.39097/- in the account of the complainant who has been authorized to suffer statement before this Forum on the basis of document Ex. R.2.  On the other hand, the complainant also suffered statement and in view of his statement, the present complaint is dismissed as withdrawn with no order as to costs as at present no cause of action survives in favour of the complainant.  File be consigned to the records.

                                                             

                          L.Member          Member                     President,

                                                                                       28.3.2019.

 

 

 

Consumer Court Lawyer

Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!

Experties

Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes

Phone Number

7982270319

Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.