NCDRC

NCDRC

RP/1926/2007

KRISHAN @ RAM KRISHAN - Complainant(s)

Versus

S. D. O. 'OP' UHBVNL - Opp.Party(s)

MR. SHISH PAL LALER, ADV.

16 Sep 2011

ORDER

NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION
NEW DELHI
 
REVISION PETITION NO. 1926 OF 2007
 
(Against the Order dated 22/02/2007 in Appeal No. 876/2005 of the State Commission Haryana)
1. KRISHAN @ RAM KRISHAN
R/O VILLAGE KHARKALI, TEHSIL THSESAR,
DISTRICT KURUKSHETRA
HARYANA
...........Petitioner(s)
Versus 
1. S. D. O. 'OP' UHBVNL
S/DIV. RADAUR,
DISTT. YAMUNA NAGAR
HARYANA
...........Respondent(s)

BEFORE: 
 HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK BHAN, PRESIDENT
 HON'BLE MRS. VINEETA RAI, MEMBER

For the Petitioner :MR. SHISH PAL LALER, ADV.
For the Respondent :NEMO

Dated : 16 Sep 2011
ORDER

This revision petition was dismissed on 14.11.2007 by a Bench consisting of Mr.Justice S. N. Kapoor and Mr. B. K. Taimni, Hon’ble Members of this Commission by observing thus:

None  is present for the petitioner.

The case was called for earlier and passed over.  None is present on the second call also.

 

-2-

The learned State Commission has allowed the appeal of the respondent and dismissed the complaint on two grounds, firstly, that as per record brought on record by the respondent, there was no electric supply between 8 am to 2 pm, hence there was no question to two cables coming into contact and resulting fire as there was no electric supply; secondly, that they have also held that the circuit breakers provided in built insularity against such an accident.

We had given time to the Ld. Counsel for the petitioner to bring on record some evidence of Expert Electrical Engineer to assail the findings of the State Commission to enable us to re-consider the matter.  The petitioner has not complied with the direction.  In the present state of affairs, there is nothing on record for us to take a view different from the view taken by the State Commission.

The revision petition is dismissed accordingly.”

          Petitioner has filed the review application.  Counsel for the applicant/petitioner even today has not put on record any evidence of expert Electrical Engineer to assail the finding of the State Commission to enable us to reconsider the matter.  The revision

 

-3-

petition was dismissed for non compliance of the direction issued by this Commission.  Review can be entertained and allowed only if there is any mistake apparent on the face of order.  No such mistake has been pointed out.  Misc. application is dismissed.

 

 
......................J
ASHOK BHAN
PRESIDENT
......................
VINEETA RAI
MEMBER

Consumer Court Lawyer

Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!

Experties

Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes

Phone Number

7982270319

Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.