Maharashtra

Additional DCF, Thane

CC/21/260

KU. KRAN VILAS PARTE/ MRS. KIRAN AKSHAY KALE - Complainant(s)

Versus

ROYAL SUNDARAM GENERAL INSURANCE CO. LTD. - Opp.Party(s)

S. R. LODHE

10 Jan 2022

ORDER

THANE ADDITIONAL DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION
Room no. 428 and 429, Konkan Bhavan Annex Building, 4th Floor,
C.B.D. Belapur, Navi Mumbai 400 614
 
Complaint Case No. CC/21/260
( Date of Filing : 17 Dec 2021 )
 
1. KU. KRAN VILAS PARTE/ MRS. KIRAN AKSHAY KALE
SARTHI, PLOT NO. 70, SECTOR-2B, NEAR DATTA MEGHE COLLEGE, AIROLI, NAVI MUMBAI 400708
...........Complainant(s)
Versus
1. ROYAL SUNDARAM GENERAL INSURANCE CO. LTD.
(F0RMERLY KOWN AS ROYAL SUNDARAM ALLIANCE INSURANCE CO. LTD.) CORPORATE CLAIMS DEPARTMENT, VISHRANTHI MELARAM TOWER NO. 2/319, RAJIV GANDHI SALAI (OMR), KARAPAKKAM, DIST. CHENNAI, TAMILNADU 600097
2. MRS. SUREKHA (EXECUTIVE MOTOR CLAIM) ROYAL SUNDARAM GENERAL INSURANCE
DELPHI, C - WING, 2ND FLOOR, 201-204, HIRANANDANI BUSINESS PARK, POWAI, MUMBAI 400076
3. MAHINDRA FINANCIAL SERVICES LTD.
1ST FLOOR, SANKALP HEIGHTS NARIPADA, EASTERN EXPRESS HIGHWAY, OPP. JUPITER HOSPITAL, NR. FLOWER VALLERY, THANE 400601
............Opp.Party(s)
 
BEFORE: 
 HON'BLE MR. R.P.Nagre PRESIDENT
 HON'BLE MS. Gauri M. Kapse MEMBER
 HON'BLE MRS. Sheetal A.Petkar MEMBER
 
PRESENT:
 
Dated : 10 Jan 2022
Final Order / Judgement

                                                                                                 ORDER EXH-1                        

Date 10/01/2022

Perused the complaint. Heard Adv. Of the Complainant.

It is observed that the policy issued in the name of M/s Kiran Tours & Travels but in para No. 2 of the complaint, it is avert that the vehicle is purchase in the name of the Complainant Kiran Kale/Kiran Parte from this averment it is seen that the name mentioned in the policy and Complainant name before this Commission is different.

It is averred in para No. 4.1 that, Complainant started tours and travel business under the name of style Kiran Tours & Travels and therefore the policy of said vehicle is in the name of Krian Tours & Travels.

The Complainant in her Complaint submitted that, she entered with an agreement of sale of vehicle with one Rakesh the Police registered the crime u/s 406 of IPC against the Rakesh and investigated the matter but they failed to avert the said Rakesh.

Thereafter the Complainant lodged the claim with the Op.No. 1 & 2 for loss of vehicle, but the Complainant in his Complaint no where maintioned that loss caused by the breach of trust is covered under the policy issued by Op.No. 1 & 2 and therefore, the complaint stands dismissed.   

 

 
 
[HON'BLE MR. R.P.Nagre]
PRESIDENT
 
 
[HON'BLE MS. Gauri M. Kapse]
MEMBER
 
 
[HON'BLE MRS. Sheetal A.Petkar]
MEMBER
 

Consumer Court Lawyer

Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!

Experties

Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes

Phone Number

7982270319

Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.