Kerala

Thiruvananthapuram

CC/204/2021

Anoop A S - Complainant(s)

Versus

RMC Mullishoppe - Opp.Party(s)

28 Sep 2021

ORDER

BEFORE THE DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION VAZHUTHACADU THIRUVANANTHAPURAM

PRESENT

     SRI.P.V.JAYARAJAN           : PRESIDENT

SMT.PREETHA G NAIR       : MEMBER

SRI.VIJU.V.R                     : MEMBER

CC.NO.204/2021 (Filed on 05.07.2021)

ORDER DATED: 28.09.2021

 

COMPLAINANT

            Anoop.A.S, Suma Bhavan,

            Chemboor, Thiruvananthapuram

            Pin – 695125

 

                             (Party in person)

                                                         VS

OPPOSITE PARTY

                    RMC Multishoppe,

                    Ground Floor,

                    Dianby World,

                    Near Kalabhavan,

                    Vazhuthacadu, Thiruvananthapuram

                                      

                                                ORDER

 

SRI.P.V.JAYARAJAN      : PRESIDENT

                   This is a complaint filed under section 35 of Consumer Protection Act 2019 and stood over to this date for consideration and this Commission passed the following order.

 

              2.  Complainant’s case in short is that on 24.06.2021 he purchased a brand new electric kettle from the opposite party by paying Rs.1254/-. Subsequently, the complainant noticed that there was a leackage for the brand new electric kettle purchased by the complainant from the opposite party. Hence on 28.06.2021 the complainant approached the opposite party and informed about the defect in the kettle purchased from the opposite party and requested to replace the same with another piece. But the opposite party refused to accept the defective electric kettle and also refused to replace the same with another one. According to the complainant selling of a defective article as if the same is a brand new item, by the opposite party to the complainant amounts to unfair practice. Hence the complainant approached this commission for redressing his grievance.

 

              3.  After admitting the complaint, this Commission issued notice to the opposite party for appearance before this Commission on 13.08.2021 and to file version on that day. There was no sitting of the Commission on that day due to Covid 19 restrictions, the case was adjourned to 13.10.2021 by notification.

 

              4.  Meanwhile on 06.09.2021 the complainant filed a memo stating that the dispute between the complainant and the opposite party was amicably settled out of Court and hence the complainant is not willing to further proceed with this complaint.

 

              5.  In view of the settlement memo filed by the complainant, this Commission suo moto advanced this case from 13.10.2021 to 24.09.2021 and after accepting the memo the case was posted to 28.09.2021 for orders.

 

              6.  In view of the settlement memo filed by the complainant, we consider that this is a fit case to be dismissed as not pressed.

 

              In the result, the complaint is dismissed as not pressed. There will be no order as to costs.

 

                      A copy of this order as per the statutory requirements be forwarded to the parties free of charge and thereafter the file be consigned to the record room.

 

           Dictated to the Confidential Assistant, transcribed by her corrected by me and pronounced in the Open court, this the 28^th September 2021.

 

                                                                               Sd/-

P.V.JAYARAJAN:  PRESIDENT

 

                                                                                         Sd/-

PREETHA G NAIR   :  MEMBER

 

                                                                                          Sd/-

VIJU.V.R   : MEMBER

 

 

 

 

 

Be/

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

BEFORE THE DISTRICT

CONSUMER DISPUTES

REDRESSAL COMMISSION

VAZHUTHACADU

 THIRUVANANTHAPURAM

 

CC.NO.204/2021

ORDER DATED: 28.09.2021